Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29803815›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2018

The "Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer Screenings" study: Rationale and design.

Yamile Molina, Liliana G San Miguel, Lizeth Tamayo, Casandra Robledo, Carola Sánchez Díaz, Araceli Lucio, Nora Coronado, Carol Estwing Ferrans

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strategies to Promote Empowerment Status of Breast Cancer Women.International journal of breast cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. The Integration of Value Assessment and Social Network Methods for Breast Health Navigation Among African Americans.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Comparing Different Interventions' Effects on Latinas' Screening Mammography Attainment and Participant-Driven Information Diffusion.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yamile MolinaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States. Electronic address: ymolin2@uic.edu.
Liliana G San MiguelUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Lizeth TamayoUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Casandra RobledoUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Carola Sánchez DíazUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
Araceli LucioThe Resurrection Project, United States.
Nora CoronadoCentro Comunitario Juan Diego, United States.
Carol Estwing FerransUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
University of Illinois Chicago · USCentro Comunitario Juan Diego · USResurrection Health Care · US

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
Empowering Latinas to Obtain Breast Cancer ScreeningsK01CA193918 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOLINA, YAMILE · 2016 to 2020
$729k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatinas suffer disproportionately from breast cancer (BC) in part due to lower guideline-concordant screening. Multiple intervention approaches have been developed to promote screening through direct patient education and empowerment approaches (i.e., training community members to share BC information). This study compares the relative effects of these approaches on: 1) women's BC screening; and, 2) women's dissemination of BC information within their social networks. DESIGN/

methodsOur quasi-experimental trial is being implemented in community venues in two predominantly Latino neighborhoods in South and West Chicago. Eligible participants: 1) are female; 2) are 52-74 years old; 3) have not obtained a mammogram in the past 2 years; and, 4) have not previously participated in health-related volunteerism. Based on their geographic location, participants are assigned to one of two group-based interventions. Both interventions consist of three two-hour sessions, which includes BC early detection education. The education intervention sessions also covers BC prevention (diet, physical activity), whereas the empowerment intervention covers sharing information with family/friends, and health volunteerism. Navigation is provided for all women who wish to obtain mammograms. Primary outcomes include: 1) receipt of BC screening; and, 2) participants' dissemination of BC information. Secondary outcomes include positive changes in 1) participants' self-reported psychosocial facilitators; and, 2) social network members' BC behaviors. DISCUSSION: The design of our program allows for a preliminary comparison of the effectiveness of these two approaches. This work will inform larger comparativeness trials and offers a new approach to intervention evaluation via social network analysis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHispanic or LatinoMammographyAgedCommunity NetworksFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationMiddle AgedNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationProgram EvaluationUnited StatesWomen's HealthBreast cancerHealth disparitiesLatinasScreening

Identifiers

PMID29803815
PMCPMC6067958
OpenAlexW2803953997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.