Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29803784›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2018

Injectable nanocomposite analgesic delivery system for musculoskeletal pain management.

Manakamana Khanal, Shalini V Gohil, Emmanuel Kuyinu, Ho-Man Kan, Brittany E Knight, Kyle M Baumbauer, Kevin W-H Lo, Joseph Walker, Cato T Laurencin, Lakshmi S Nair

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Injectable Hydrogel Delivery System with High Drug Loading for Prolonging Local Anesthesia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Animal Models of Osteoarthritis: Updated Models and Outcome Measures 2016-2023.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manakamana KhanalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Institute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Shalini V GohilDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Institute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Emmanuel KuyinuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Institute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Ho-Man KanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Institute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Brittany E KnightDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Kyle M BaumbauerThe Center for Advancement in Managing Pain, School of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Kevin W-H LoInstitute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Department of Endocrinology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Joseph WalkerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Cato T LaurencinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Institute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA; Department of Material Science and Engineering, Institute of Material Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA; Department of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Lakshmi S NairDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Institute for Regenerative Engineering, The Raymond Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical, Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA; Department of Material Science and Engineering, Institute of Material Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA. Electronic address: nair@uchc.edu.
UConn Health · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Novel Injectable Analgesic Delivery System for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain ManagR21AR066320 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LO, WAI HONG, NAIR, LAKSHMI S · 2014 to 2016
$483k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal pain is a major health issue which results from surgical procedures (i.e. total knee and/or hip replacements and rotator cuff repairs), as well as from non-surgical conditions (i.e. sympathetically-mediated pain syndrome and occipital neuralgia). Local anesthetics, opioids or corticosteroids are currently used for the pain management of musculoskeletal conditions. Even though local anesthetics are highly preferred, the need for multiple administration presents significant disadvantages. Development of unique delivery systems that can deliver local anesthetics at the injection site for prolonged time could significantly enhance the therapeutic efficacy and patient comfort. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of an injectable local anesthetic nanocomposite carrier to provide sustained analgesic effect. The nanocomposite carrier was developed by encapsulating ropivacaine, a local anesthetic, in lipid nanocapsules (LNC-Rop), and incorporating the nanocapsules in enzymatically crosslinked glycol chitosan (0.3GC) hydrogels. Cryo Scanning Electron Microscopic (Cryo SEM) images showed the ability to distribute the LNCs within the hydrogel without adversely affecting their morphology. The study demonstrated the feasibility to achieve sustained release of lipophilic molecules from the nanocomposite carrier in vitro and in vivo. A rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) pain model was used to evaluate the efficacy of the nanocomposite carrier using thermal paw withdrawal latency (TWL). The nanocomposite carriers loaded with ropivacaine and dexamethasone showed significant improvement in pain response compared to the control groups for at least 7 days. The study demonstrated the clinical potential of these nanocomposite carriers for post-operative and neuropathic pain. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Acute or chronic pain associated with musculoskeletal conditions is considered a major health issue, with healthcare costs totaling several billion dollars. The opioid crisis presents a pressing clinical need to develop alternative and effective approaches to treat musculoskeletal pain. The goal of this study was to develop a long-acting injectable anesthetic formulation which can sustain a local anesthetic effect for a prolonged time. This in turn could increase the quality of life and rehabilitation outcome of patients, and decrease opioid consumption. The developed injectable nanocomposite demonstrated the feasibility to achieve prolonged pain relief in a rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) model.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsDexamethasoneMusculoskeletal PainNanocompositesRopivacaineAnimalsDelayed-Action PreparationsDisease Models, AnimalDrug CarriersFemaleHydrogelsMaleMiceMice, HairlessRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnalgesicsDelayed-Action PreparationsDexamethasoneDrug CarriersHydrogelsRopivacaineAnestheticsChitosan hydrogelInjectable nanocompositeLipid nanocapsulePain management

Identifiers

PMID29803784
PMCPMC6020057
OpenAlexW2804809208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.