Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29803772›Full record

Trial reportJournal of surgical education2018

Long-Term Skills Retention Following a Randomized Prospective Trial on Adaptive Procedural Training.

Adriana G Ramirez, Yinin Hu, Helen Kim, Sara K Rasmussen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of surgical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05290974 (Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05290974 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2022 to 2024Enrolled23ConditionsEducationArmsSelf exploring of available online material on supraclavicular brachial plexus block, Conventional in-person teaching on supraclavicular brachial plexus block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adriana G RamirezDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Yinin HuDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Helen KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Sara K RasmussenDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: skr3f@virginia.edu.

Funding

Cardiovascular Surgery Training ProgramT32HL007849 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI KRON, IRVING L., LAUBACH, VICTOR E · 1998 to 2025
$7.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCumulative sum (CuSum) is a real-time proficiency-monitoring tool adapted for simulation-based training. This study's objective was to investigate long-term outcomes of a double blinded, randomized control trial conducted with medical students assessing CuSum-guided curriculum against volume-based standards. The trial found a nearly 20% reduction in practice time to reach proficiency using the CuSum curriculum but long-term effects of decreased practice volume on proficiency is unknown.

designPrior participants completed a survey assessing confidence, exposure, and feedback at 12 to 18 months following trial completion. They underwent retention testing of suturing, intubation, and central venous catheter placement (CVC), which was video-recorded and assessed by an expert evaluator. Baseline characteristics among repeat subjects were compared using chi-squared tests. Retention and initial trial outcome were compared using paired parametric statistical methods.

settingThe study was conducted at a major tertiary care center and training hospital.

participantsMedical students, which completed the initial randomized control trial were eligible for enrollment. A total of 30/46(65%) responded to the survey, whereas 33/46(72%) completed retention testing.

resultsAverage scores and decay in procedural tasks over time for suturing, intubation and CVC were 91.6% (-4.7%), 86.1% (-4.1%), and 76.2% (-14.8%), respectively. Compared to the control group, the CuSum group mean difference in retention evaluation scores was -5.6% (p = 0.12). Confidence was not associated with initial or retention testing performance in any procedural task. Higher confidence was associated with additional exposure to the procedural task in suturing and intubation (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). For intubation, higher confidence was reported by participants who received positive feedback (p = 0.01), and those assigned to the volume-based training arm (p = 0.03).

conclusionCuSum-guided training was equivalent to conventional training for suturing, intubation, and CVC. These findings importantly suggest medical students can retain competency in invasive surgical tasks with modest decay in proficiency over time regardless of initial training method.

Indexed as

CurriculumSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceDouble-Blind MethodEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansMaleProspective StudiesTime Factorscompetency-based curriculumcumulative summedical student educationPractice-Based Learning and Improvementsimulation trainingsurgical education

Identifiers

PMID29803772
PMCPMC6252163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.