Trial reportJournal of surgical education2018
Long-Term Skills Retention Following a Randomized Prospective Trial on Adaptive Procedural Training.
Trial report in Journal of surgical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05290974 (Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between Self-directed Online Educational Material and Conventional Teaching in Acquiring Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia Skills for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block by Novice Performers
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Piloting a framework to explore the impacts of public health workforce capacity-building initiatives.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Remote, asynchronous training and feedback enables development of neurodynamic skills in physiotherapy students.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Medical students’ self-assessed efficacy and satisfaction with training on endotracheal intubation and central venous catheterization with smart glasses in Taiwan: a non-equivalent control-group pre- and post-test studyJournal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2022Observational
- Cumulative Sum Analysis of the Learning Curve of Ptosis Surgery: External Levator Advancement versus Müller Muscle-conjunctival Resection.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2021Article
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of a novel curriculum to teach transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a 3-year experience of urology simulation bootcamp course.World journal of urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCumulative sum (CuSum) is a real-time proficiency-monitoring tool adapted for simulation-based training. This study's objective was to investigate long-term outcomes of a double blinded, randomized control trial conducted with medical students assessing CuSum-guided curriculum against volume-based standards. The trial found a nearly 20% reduction in practice time to reach proficiency using the CuSum curriculum but long-term effects of decreased practice volume on proficiency is unknown.
designPrior participants completed a survey assessing confidence, exposure, and feedback at 12 to 18 months following trial completion. They underwent retention testing of suturing, intubation, and central venous catheter placement (CVC), which was video-recorded and assessed by an expert evaluator. Baseline characteristics among repeat subjects were compared using chi-squared tests. Retention and initial trial outcome were compared using paired parametric statistical methods.
settingThe study was conducted at a major tertiary care center and training hospital.
participantsMedical students, which completed the initial randomized control trial were eligible for enrollment. A total of 30/46(65%) responded to the survey, whereas 33/46(72%) completed retention testing.
resultsAverage scores and decay in procedural tasks over time for suturing, intubation and CVC were 91.6% (-4.7%), 86.1% (-4.1%), and 76.2% (-14.8%), respectively. Compared to the control group, the CuSum group mean difference in retention evaluation scores was -5.6% (p = 0.12). Confidence was not associated with initial or retention testing performance in any procedural task. Higher confidence was associated with additional exposure to the procedural task in suturing and intubation (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). For intubation, higher confidence was reported by participants who received positive feedback (p = 0.01), and those assigned to the volume-based training arm (p = 0.03).
conclusionCuSum-guided training was equivalent to conventional training for suturing, intubation, and CVC. These findings importantly suggest medical students can retain competency in invasive surgical tasks with modest decay in proficiency over time regardless of initial training method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.