Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29803113›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2018

Engineered protein scaffolds as leads for synthetic inhibitors of protein-protein interactions.

Michael G Wuo, Paramjit S Arora

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Reengineering of a Proteomimetic Pan-Ras Inhibitor into a Ras Degrader.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Selective Affimers Recognise the BCL-2 Family Proteins BCL-xChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Versatile Peptide Macrocyclization with Diels-Alder Cycloadditions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Synthetic Control of Tertiary Helical Structures in Short Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael G WuoDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Paramjit S AroraDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. Electronic address: arora@nyu.edu.

Funding

Biomolecular Recognition with Artificial Alpha-HelicesR01GM073943 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ARORA, PARAMJIT S · 2005 to 2018
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationally designed protein-protein interaction inhibitors mimic interfacial binding epitopes, specifically residues that contribute significantly to binding. However, direct mimicry often does not lead to high affinity ligands because the natural complexes themselves are functionally transient and of low affinity. The mimics typically need to be optimized for potency. Engineered proteins displaying conformationally-defined epitopes may serve as attractive alternatives to natural protein partners as they can be strictly screened for tight binding. The advantage of focused screens with conformationally-defined protein scaffolds is that conservation of the geometry of the natural binding epitopes may preserve binding site specificity while allowing direct mimicry by various synthetic secondary structure scaffolds. Here we review different classes of engineered proteins for their binding epitope geometry and as leads for synthetic secondary and tertiary structure mimics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesDrug DiscoveryHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProtein Interaction MapsProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID29803113
PMCPMC5967659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.