ReviewActa biomaterialia2018
Design of spherically structured 3D in vitro tumor models -Advances and prospects.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.
- Models of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Temporal Analysis.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026Pooled it
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Interferon regulatory factor 4-releasing 3D-printed scaffolds enhance spinal cord repair by modulating macrophage polarization.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Advantages and research progress of three-dimensional culture systems for lung cancer drug screening (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Focused ultrasound for cellular mechanoactivation and nanomedicine delivery in cancer.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Review
- Recapitulation of human 3D colorectal cancer model using smart thermo-responsive hydrogel for monitoring angiogenesis.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Durable and biofunctional polydimethylsiloxane surfaces engineered with photocrosslinkable terpolymers for aligned and functional myotube formation.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2026Article
- The application of experimental models for the drug discovery for digestive tumors.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Organ-on-a-Chip Technology and Global Multi-Omics: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Article
- Revisiting ISO 10993-5 In Vitro Cytotoxicity Standard Tests for Evaluation of Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials.International journal of biomaterials · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional-bioprinted stiff matrix triggers PDAC radioresistance through histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation (H3K18la) potentiates RAD51 activation.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Application and prospects of lung organ-on-a-chip in the development of new drugs.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- From Spheroids to Tumor-on-a-Chip for Cancer Modeling and Therapeutic Testing.Micromachines · 2025Review
- From 2D to 3D: transforming malignant bone tumor research with advanced culture models.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional spheroid models for cardiovascular biology and pathology.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Review
- 3D Microtumors Representing Ovarian Cancer Minimal Residual Disease Respond to the Fatty Acid Oxidation Inhibitor Perhexiline.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Review
- Microfluidic 3D cell culture: potential application of collagen hydrogels with an optimal dose of bioactive glasses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing 3D cell models and high-resolution imaging to unveil the mechanisms of nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional multicellular tumor models are receiving an ever-growing focus as preclinical drug-screening platforms due to their potential to recapitulate major physiological features of human tumors in vitro. In line with this momentum, the technologies for assembly of 3D microtumors are rapidly evolving towards a comprehensive inclusion of tumor microenvironment elements. Customized spherically structured platforms, including microparticles and microcapsules, provide a robust and scalable technology to imprint unique biomolecular tumor microenvironment hallmarks into 3D in vitro models. Herein, a comprehensive overview of novel advances on the integration of tumor-ECM components and biomechanical cues into 3D in vitro models assembled in spherical shaped platforms is provided. Future improvements regarding spatiotemporal/mechanical adaptability, and degradability, during microtumors in vitro 3D culture are also critically discussed considering the realistic potential of these platforms to mimic the dynamic tumor microenvironment. From a global perspective, the production of 3D multicellular spheroids with tumor ECM components included in spherical models will unlock their potential to be used in high-throughput screening of therapeutic compounds. It is envisioned, in a near future, that a combination of spherically structured 3D microtumor models with other advanced microfluidic technologies will properly recapitulate the flow dynamics of human tumors in vitro. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The ability to correctly mimic the complexity of the tumor microenvironment in vitro is a key aspect for the development of evermore realistic in vitro models for drug-screening and fundamental cancer biology studies. In this regard, conventional spheroid-based 3D tumor models, combined with spherically structured biomaterials, opens the opportunity to precisely recapitulate complex cell-extracellular matrix interactions and tumor compartmentalization. This review provides an in-depth focus on current developments regarding spherically structured scaffolds engineered into in vitro 3D tumor models, and discusses future advances toward all-encompassing platforms that may provide an improved in vitro/in vivo correlation in a foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.