Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802916›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience letters2019

Autophagy at the synapse.

Veronica Birdsall, Clarissa L Waites

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Macroautophagy in CNS health and disease.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Autophagy in axonal and presynaptic development.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Huntingtin and the Synapse.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  19. CBeLife · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veronica BirdsallNeurobiology and Behavior Graduate Program, Columbia University, United States.
Clarissa L WaitesDepartment of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, United States. Electronic address: cw2622@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Uncovering the Roles of Ubiquitination and the ESCRT Pathway in Degradative Sorting of SV Proteins.R01NS080967 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WAITES, CLARISSA LEIGH · 2013 to 2023
$3.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the sites of communication between neurons, synapses depend upon precisely regulated protein-protein interactions to support neurotransmitter release and reception. Moreover, neuronal synapses typically exist great distances (i.e. up to meters) away from cell bodies, which are the sources of new proteins and the major sites of protein degradation via lysosomes. Thus, synapses are uniquely sensitive to disruptions in proteostasis, and depend upon carefully orchestrated degradative mechanisms for the clearance of dysfunctional proteins. One of the primary cellular degradative pathways is macroautophagy, hereafter referred to as 'autophagy'. Although it has only recently become a focus of research in synaptic biology, emerging studies indicate that autophagy has essential functions at the synapse throughout an organism's lifetime. This review will discuss recent findings about the roles of synaptic autophagy, as well as some of the questions and issues to be considered in this field moving forward.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyHumansSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionSynaptic VesiclesAMPA receptorAutophagyMacroautophagySynapseSynaptic vesicle

Identifiers

PMID29802916
PMCPMC6251759
OpenAlexW2804112485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.