SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018
Cetuximab or Nimotuzumab Versus Cisplatin Concurrent with Radiotherapy for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis
Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESMO-ESTRO consensus statements on the safety of combining radiotherapy with EGFR, ALK, or BRAF/MEK inhibitors.ESMO open · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Nimotuzumab in Combination with Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy for Local Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current cancer drug targets · 2024Pooled it
- Improvement and prognosis analysis of nimotuzumab combined with TP regimen induction chemotherapy and sequential concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of nimotuzumab for the radiotherapy of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
- Successful treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer using radiotherapy with concurrent cetuximab in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
- EGFR inhibitor C225 Increases the Radio-Sensitivity of Human Breast Cancer CellsAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Cetuximab Plus Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether Cetuximab (CTX) or Nimotuzumab (NTZ) concurrent with radiotherapy delivers equivalent or improved results with fewer toxicities over standard cisplatin (CDDP) concurrent with radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: The strategy involved searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet Web, Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical databases. Controlled clinical trials that compared concurrent CTX/NTZ with radiotherapy versus CDDP with radiotherapy in local-regionally advanced NPC were included. Results: In all, 1,239 patients in six clinical trials were included in the analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) between the CTX/NTZ and CDDP groups were 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.64), 1.06 (95% CI 0.50-2.25), 1.04 (95% CI 0.61-1.76), and 1.05 (95% CI 0.73-1.50) for overall survival, local-regional failure-free survival, distant metastasis failure-free survival, and disease-free survival, respectively. Significant differences were found in the incidences of grade 3-4 anaemia [Risk ratio (RR) 0.11 95% CI 0.02-0.58], grade 3-4 neutropenia (RR 0.23 95% CI 0.12- 0.44), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR 0.31 95% CI 0.12- 0.79), and grade 3-4 vomiting (RR 0.04 95% CI 0.00-0.29) in favour of the CTX/NTZ group. However, the patients in the CTX/NTZ group experienced a higher incidence of grade 3-4 skin rash (RR 6.45 95% CI 3.84-10.84). Conclusions: Regarding the efficacy and side effects, the combination of CTX / NTZ and radiotherapy may be an alterative treatment regimen of standard CDDP concurrent with radiotherapy in local-regionally advanced NPC, especially in patients who cannot tolerate or who refuse chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.