ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2018
Comparison of Salivary Cotinine Concentrations in Male Smokers and Smokeless Tobacco Users
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood Pressure and Salivary Cotinine Levels in Young Adults Using Heated Tobacco Products: A Case-Control Study in Poland.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The Use of Saliva as a Biosample in the Light of COVID-19.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Salivary MMP-9 as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- Correlation of urinary cotinine with cardiovascular risk factors in pan masala tobacco users.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Smoking cigarettes and smokeless tobacco are one of the causes of oral cancer. This study compared the salivary level of cotinine in male smokeless tobacco users and smokers. Methods: In this cross-sectional (descriptive-analytical) study, stimulated saliva samples from 30 male smokers and 30 male smokeless tobacco consumers were collected and their cotinine contents were measured using the competitive ELISA method according the standard curve. The data was analyzed with independent t-test and linear regression using SPSS-19, and P<0.05 was considered significant. Result: Among the 60 subjects with the mean age of 21.27±2.6 years, the average level of cotinine in smokers (12.32±7.5 ng/ml) had no significant difference with that of smokeless tobacco consumers (11.23±4.4 ng/ml) (p=0.49). Conclusion: Salivary levels of cotinine were not significantly different in smokeless tobacco users and cigarette smokers. In addition, increases in the number of cigarettes smoked and in pack of smokeless tobacco used, were associated with increased salivary levels of cotinine. The increase was higher in smokeless tobacco consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.