Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802662›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2018

A resolved discrepancy between multiplex PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification by targeted next-generation sequencing discloses a novel partial exonic deletion in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene.

Chang Liu, Huiting Deng, Cheng Yang, Xixi Li, Yanrong Zhu, Xiangfa Chen, Hui Li, Shuo Li, Hao Cui, Xiaoyan Zhang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Droplet Digital PCR Improves Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. A NovelFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang LiuDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Huiting DengDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Cheng YangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xixi LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Yanrong ZhuDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiangfa ChenDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Shuo LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hao CuiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoyan ZhangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoyue TanDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Dong LiDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Children's Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhujun ZhangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-5049
Nankai University · CNTianjin Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 30971590National Natural Science Foundation of China 81371921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe genetic diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) has been complicated by the large size of the gene and its heterogeneous mutational spectrum. Multiplex PCR and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) are two well-established mutation screening methods. Here, we applied targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to clarify discrepant results between multiplex PCR and MLPA in a Chinese patient with DMD.

methodsMLPA was performed to confirm multiplex PCR results obtained previously. Targeted NGS was then used to analyze the full-length DMD gene including introns.

resultsMultiplex PCR had previously identified an apparent deletion of exon 43 in the patient with DMD, but current MLPA indicated that exon 43 was present. Targeted NGS to clarify the genetic diagnosis identified a novel mutation, c.6241_c.6290 + 1109del1159insAC, which caused partial deletion of exon 43. This mutation removed the annealing sequence of the exon 43 reverse primer in multiplex PCR but had no influence on the hybridization site of the MLPA probe. Therefore, the discrepancy between the two methods was caused by partial exonic deletion that escaped MLPA detection.

conclusionTargeted NGS disclosed a novel partial exonic deletion in the DMD gene as the cause of discrepancy between multiplex PCR and MLPA. Targeted NGS could be used to provide a more accurate genetic diagnosis of DMD, particularly in cases of partial exonic deletions, which will be of benefit in patient management and the identification of disease carriers.

Indexed as

AdolescentDystrophinExonsGene DeletionHumansMaleMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneDMD protein, humanDystrophinduchenne muscular dystrophymultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationmultiplex PCRnext-generation sequencingpartial exonic deletion

Identifiers

PMID29802662
PMCPMC6816888
OpenAlexW2804622367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.