Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802583›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2018

Contrast medium induced acute kidney injury: a narrative review.

Valentina Pistolesi, Giuseppe Regolisti, Santo Morabito, Ilaria Gandolfini, Silvia Corrado, Giovanni Piotti, Enrico Fiaccadori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina PistolesiHemodialysis Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. valentina.pistolesi@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9720-9462
Giuseppe RegolistiAcute and Chronic Renal Failure Unit, Parma University Medical School, Parma, Italy.
Santo MorabitoHemodialysis Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria GandolfiniAcute and Chronic Renal Failure Unit, Parma University Medical School, Parma, Italy.
Silvia CorradoAcute and Chronic Renal Failure Unit, Parma University Medical School, Parma, Italy.
Giovanni PiottiAcute and Chronic Renal Failure Unit, Parma University Medical School, Parma, Italy.
Enrico FiaccadoriAcute and Chronic Renal Failure Unit, Parma University Medical School, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsContrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury. It is more commonly observed following intra-arterial administration of iodinated contrast media (CM) for cardiac procedures in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD), and is associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. This review investigates the key current evidence on CI-AKI definition, epidemiology and pathogenesis, as a basis for recommending preventive measures that can be implemented in clinical practice.

methodsAn extensive literature search was performed to identify the relevant studies describing the epidemiology, pathogenesis, outcome and prevention of CI-AKI. RESULTS AND

conclusionPre-existing CKD, intra-arterial administration and CM volume are the most important risk factors for CI-AKI. Since risk factors for CI-AKI are well defined, and the timing of renal insult is known, patients should be carefully stratified before the administration of CM, in order to reduce the negative impact of modifiable risk factors on renal function. The intravenous administration of moderate amounts of isotonic saline solution or bicarbonate solution still represents the principal intervention with documented and acceptable effectiveness for CI-AKI prevention. More data are needed on aggressive volume expansion strategies along with diuretics, targeting forced diuresis with high urinary output. The role of antioxidant agents remains controversial, and only moderate evidence exists in favour of N-acetylcysteine. Statins could contribute to reducing the incidence of CI-AKI, although their mechanism of action is not fully ascertained. No robust data demonstrate a reduction of CI-AKI incidence by peri-procedural hemodialysis/hemofiltration; renal replacement therapies may carry instead unnecessary risks. Remote ischemic preconditioning might represent a simple, non-invasive and cost effective preventive measure for CI-AKI prevention, but few data are currently available about its clinical application in patients at high risk of CI-AKI.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnimalsContrast MediaHumansKidneyPrognosisProtective AgentsProtective FactorsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsContrast MediaProtective AgentsAcute kidney injuryIodinated contrast mediaN-AcetylcysteineNephrotoxicityStatins

Identifiers

PMID29802583
OpenAlexW2803788064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.