Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802552›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2019

Evaluating Ga-68 Peptide Conjugates for Targeting VPAC Receptors: Stability and Pharmacokinetics.

Pardeep Kumar, Sushil K Tripathi, C P Chen, Eric Wickstrom, Mathew L Thakur

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pardeep KumarDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sushil K TripathiDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
C P ChenSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China.
Eric WickstromDepartments of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mathew L ThakurDepartments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Mathew.Thakur@Jefferson.edu.

Funding

VPAC1 Recpetor-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate CancerR01CA157372 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI THAKUR, MATHEW LAXMAN · 2012 to 2017
$2.6M
PET for Molecular Imaging of Small AnimalsS10RR023709 · NCRR · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI THAKUR, MATHEW LAXMAN · 2008 to 2008
$500k
SPECT/CT for Molecular Imaging Facility at TJUS10OD012406 · OD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI THAKUR, MATHEW LAXMAN · 2014 to 2014
$300k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157372NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023709NIH HHS S10 OD012406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, considerable progress has been made in the use of gallium-68 labeled receptor-specific peptides for imaging oncologic diseases. The objective was to examine the stability and pharmacokinetics of [ PROCEDURES: A VPAC receptor-specific peptide was chosen as a model peptide and conjugated to NODAGA and DOTA via solid-phase synthesis. The conjugates were characterized by HPLC and MALDI-TOF. Following Ga-68 chelation, the radiochemical purity of Ga-68 labeled peptide conjugate was determined by radio-HPLC. The stability was tested against transmetallation using 100 nM Fe

resultsThe chemical and radiochemical purity was greater than 95 % and both conjugates were stable against transchelation and transmetallation. Ex vivo stability at 60 min showed that the NODAGA-peptide-bound Ga-68 reduced to 42.1 ± 3.7 % (in plasma) and 37.4 ± 2.9 % (in urine), whereas the DOTA-peptide-bound Ga-68 was reduced to 1.2 ± 0.3 % (in plasma) and 4.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine) at 60 min. Similarly, the in vivo stability for [

conclusionNODAGA is superior to DOTA in terms of radiolabeling kinetics. The method of radiolabeling was reproducible and yielded higher specific activity. Although both agents have relatively low in vivo stability, PET/CT imaging studies delineated BC tumors with [

Indexed as

AcetatesAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug StabilityFemaleGallium RadioisotopesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, NudePeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type I1-(1,3-carboxypropyl)-4,7-carboxymethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane- 1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acidAcetatesGallium-68Gallium RadioisotopesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingPeptidesReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Type IIReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, Type IChelating agentsGallium-68Molecular imagingRadiochemistryTumor imaging

Identifiers

PMID29802552
PMCPMC6487500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.