Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802367›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Differences in the subjective and motivational properties of alcohol across alcohol use severity: application of a novel translational human laboratory paradigm.

Spencer Bujarski, J David Jentsch, Daniel J O Roche, Vijay A Ramchandani, Karen Miotto, Lara A Ray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High-intensity sweet taste as a predictor of subjective alcohol responses to the ascending limb of an intravenous alcohol prime: an fMRI study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Moderators of subjective response to alcohol in the human laboratory.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Article
  18. Sex-dependent effects of alcohol administration on the urge to use cannabis.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Spencer BujarskiDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. SBujarski@psych.ucla.edu.
J David JentschDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Daniel J O RocheDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-1519
Vijay A RamchandaniSection on Human Psychopharmacology, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Karen MiottoDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lara A RayDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USBinghamton University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Translational Research and Science Education (OUT)P60AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Marian Lee Logrip · 2003 to 2026
$45.5M
Combining Varenicline and Naltrexone for Smoking Cessation in Heavy DrinkersR01DA041226 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAY, LARA A. · 2015 to 2017
$2.1M
Development of minocycline as a neuroimmune therapy for alcohol use disorderK01AA026005 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ROCHE, DANIEL · 2017 to 2021
$925k
Modeling alcohol reward and reinforcement in the human laboratoryR21AA022752 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAY, LARA A. · 2014 to 2015
$399k
Subjective Response and Self-Administration of Alcohol in the Human LabF31AA022569 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUJARSKI, SPENCER · 2014 to 2015
$69k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022569NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026005NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA007611NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA022752NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Allostatic Model proposes that Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is associated with a transition in the motivational structure of alcohol drinking: from positive reinforcement in early-stage drinking to negative reinforcement in late-stage dependence. However, direct empirical support for this preclinical model from human experiments is limited. This study tests predictions derived from the Allostatic Model in humans. Specifically, this study tested whether alcohol use severity (1) independently predicts subjective responses to alcohol (SR; comprised of stimulation/hedonia, negative affect, sedation and craving domains), and alcohol self-administration and 2) moderates associations between domains of SR and alcohol self-administration. Heavy drinking participants ranging in severity of alcohol use and problems (N = 67) completed an intravenous alcohol administration paradigm combining an alcohol challenge (target BrAC = 60 mg%), with progressive ratio self-administration. Alcohol use severity was associated with greater baseline negative affect, sedation, and craving but did not predict changes in any SR domain during the alcohol challenge. Alcohol use severity also predicted greater self-administration. Craving during the alcohol challenge strongly predicted self-administration and sedation predicted lower self-administration. Neither stimulation, nor negative affect predicted self-administration. This study represents a novel approach to translating preclinical neuroscientific theories to the human laboratory. As expected, craving predicted self-administration and sedation was protective. Contrary to the predictions of the Allostatic Model, however, these results were inconsistent with a transition from positively to negatively reinforced alcohol consumption in severe AUD. Future studies that assess negative reinforcement in the context of an acute stressor are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAffectAlcoholismBreath TestsCentral Nervous System DepressantsCravingEthanolFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleModels, PsychologicalMotivationReinforcement, PsychologySeverity of Illness IndexCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID29802367
PMCPMC6046045
OpenAlexW2800953219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.