Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802359›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Duplications of KIAA1549 and BRAF screening by Droplet Digital PCR from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded DNA is an accurate alternative for KIAA1549-BRAF fusion detection in pilocytic astrocytomas.

Romain Appay, Frédéric Fina, Nicolas Macagno, Laëtitia Padovani, Carole Colin, Doriane Barets, Joanna Ordioni, Didier Scavarda, Felice Giangaspero, Manuela Badiali and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Droplet Digital PCR Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Specific and Sensitive Diagnosis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pediatric low-grade glioma in the era of molecular diagnostics.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Romain AppayAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Frédéric FinaAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Nicolas MacagnoAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-2162
Laëtitia PadovaniAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Radiothérapie, Marseille, France.
Carole ColinAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France.
Doriane BaretsAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Joanna OrdioniAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.
Didier ScavardaAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service de Neurochirurgie Pédiatrique, Marseille, France.
Felice GiangasperoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Manuela BadialiLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Microcitemico Pediatric Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
Andrey KorshunovCCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan M PfisterHopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
David T W JonesHopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerAPHM, Hôpital de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France. dominique.figarella-branger@univ-amu.fr.
Hôpital de la Timone · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGerman Cancer Research Center · DEIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITOspedale Microcitemico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pilocytic astrocytomas represent the most common glioma subtype in young patients and account for 5.4% of all gliomas. They are characterized by alterations in the RAS-MAP kinase pathway, the most frequent being a tandem duplication on chromosome 7q34 involving the BRAF gene, resulting in oncogenic BRAF fusion proteins. BRAF fusion involving the KIAA1549 gene is a hallmark of pilocytic astrocytoma, but it has also been recorded in rare cases of gangliogliomas, 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglial tumors, and it is also a common feature of disseminated oligodendroglial-like leptomeningeal neoplasm. In some difficult cases, evidence for KIAA1549-BRAF fusion is of utmost importance for the diagnosis. Moreover, because the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion constitutively activates the MAP kinase pathway, it represents a target for drugs such as MEK inhibitors, and therefore, the detection of this genetic abnormality is highly relevant in the context of clinical trials applying such new approaches. In the present study, we aimed to use the high sensitivity of Droplet Digital PCR (DDPCR™) to predict KIAA1549-BRAF fusion on very small amounts of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue in routine practice. Therefore, we analyzed a training cohort of 55 pilocytic astrocytomas in which the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion status was known by RNA sequencing used as our gold standard technique. Then, we analyzed a prospective cohort of 40 pilocytic astrocytomas, 27 neuroepithelial tumors remaining difficult to classify (pilocytic astrocytoma versus ganglioglioma or diffuse glioma), 15 dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors, and 18 gangliogliomas. We could demonstrate the usefulness and high accuracy (100% sensitivity and specificity when compared to RNA sequencing) of DDPCR™ to assess the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion from very low amounts of DNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. BRAF duplication is both necessary and sufficient to predict this fusion in most cases and we propose that this single analysis could be used in routine practice to save time, money, and precious tissue.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmFormaldehydeHumansOncogene Proteins, FusionParaffin EmbeddingPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTissue FixationBRAF-KIAA1549 fusion protein, humanDNA, NeoplasmFormaldehydeOncogene Proteins, Fusion

Identifiers

PMID29802359
OpenAlexW2804202266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.