ArticleScientific reports2018
Sorting Five Human Tumor Types Reveals Specific Biomarkers and Background Classification Genes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional profiles reveal histologic origin and prognosis across 33 The Cancer Genome Atlas tumor types.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of Acute Leukemia by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cellular State Transformations Using Deep Learning for Precision Medicine Applications.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Uncovering biomarker genes with enriched classification potential from Hallmark gene sets.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Data mining to understand health status preceding traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2019Observational
- Analyzing the similarity of samples and genes by MG-PCC algorithm, t-SNE-SS and t-SNE-SG maps.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We applied two state-of-the-art, knowledge independent data-mining methods - Dynamic Quantum Clustering (DQC) and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) - to data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We showed that the RNA expression patterns for a mixture of 2,016 samples from five tumor types can sort the tumors into groups enriched for relevant annotations including tumor type, gender, tumor stage, and ethnicity. DQC feature selection analysis discovered 48 core biomarker transcripts that clustered tumors by tumor type. When these transcripts were removed, the geometry of tumor relationships changed, but it was still possible to classify the tumors using the RNA expression profiles of the remaining transcripts. We continued to remove the top biomarkers for several iterations and performed cluster analysis. Even though the most informative transcripts were removed from the cluster analysis, the sorting ability of remaining transcripts remained strong after each iteration. Further, in some iterations we detected a repeating pattern of biological function that wasn't detectable with the core biomarker transcripts present. This suggests the existence of a "background classification" potential in which the pattern of gene expression after continued removal of "biomarker" transcripts could still classify tumors in agreement with the tumor type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.