Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802252›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

The development of human social learning across seven societies.

Edwin J C van Leeuwen, Emma Cohen, Emma Collier-Baker, Christian J Rapold, Marie Schäfer, Sebastian Schütte, Daniel B M Haun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
67.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Group-level signatures in bonobo sociality.Evolutionary human sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Development of Cumulative Cultural Learning.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Edwin J C van LeeuwenUniversity of St Andrews, Westburn Lane, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-2182
Emma CohenInstitute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, 51/53 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PE, UK.
Emma Collier-BakerForest, Nature and Environment Aceh, Banda Aceh, 23249, Indonesia.
Christian J RapoldDepartment of General and Comparative Linguistics, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Marie SchäferMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian SchütteMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Daniel B M HaunMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6500 AH, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. daniel.haun@uni-leipzig.de.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · NLThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social information use is a pivotal characteristic of the human species. Avoiding the cost of individual exploration, social learning confers substantial fitness benefits under a wide variety of environmental conditions, especially when the process is governed by biases toward relative superiority (e.g., experts, the majority). Here, we examine the development of social information use in children aged 4-14 years (n = 605) across seven societies in a standardised social learning task. We measured two key aspects of social information use: general reliance on social information and majority preference. We show that the extent to which children rely on social information depends on children's cultural background. The extent of children's majority preference also varies cross-culturally, but in contrast to social information use, the ontogeny of majority preference follows a U-shaped trajectory across all societies. Our results demonstrate both cultural continuity and diversity in the realm of human social learning.

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsCultural DiversitySocial BehaviorSocial EnvironmentAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansMaleSocial Learning

Identifiers

PMID29802252
PMCPMC5970179
OpenAlexW2804316175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.