ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2018
Short-Term Transcriptional Response of Microbial Communities to Nitrogen Fertilization in a Pine Forest Soil.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Conservation agriculture raises crop nitrogen acquisition by amplifying plant-microbe synergy under climate warming.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Rapid Response of Nitrogen Cycling Gene Transcription to Labile Carbon Amendments in a Soil Microbial Community.mSystems · 2021Article
- Soil Metatranscriptomes Under Long-Term Experimental Warming and Drying: Fungi Allocate Resources to Cell Metabolic Maintenance Rather Than Decay.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Chronic Physical Disturbance Substantially Alters the Response of Biological Soil Crusts to a Wetting Pulse, as Characterized by Metatranscriptomic Sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have examined the long-term effect of experimental nitrogen (N) deposition in terrestrial ecosystems; however, N-specific mechanistic markers are difficult to disentangle from responses to other environmental changes. The strongest picture of N-responsive mechanistic markers is likely to arise from measurements over a short (hours to days) time scale immediately after inorganic N deposition. Therefore, we assessed the short-term (3-day) transcriptional response of microbial communities in two soil strata from a pine forest to a high dose of N fertilization (ca. 1 mg/g of soil material) in laboratory microcosms. We hypothesized that N fertilization would repress the expression of fungal and bacterial genes linked to N mining from plant litter. However, despite N suppression of microbial respiration, the most pronounced differences in functional gene expression were between strata rather than in response to the N addition. Overall, ∼4% of metabolic genes changed in expression with N addition, while three times as many (∼12%) were significantly different across the different soil strata in the microcosms. In particular, we found little evidence of N changing expression levels of metabolic genes associated with complex carbohydrate degradation (CAZymes) or inorganic N utilization. This suggests that direct N repression of microbial functional gene expression is not the principle mechanism for reduced soil respiration immediately after N deposition. Instead, changes in expression with N addition occurred primarily in general cell maintenance areas, for example, in ribosome-related transcripts. Transcriptional changes in functional gene abundance in response to N addition observed in longer-term field studies likely result from changes in microbial composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.