Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29802146›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Risk Score to Predict Need for Intensive Care in Initially Hemodynamically Stable Adults With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Alexander C Fanaroff, Anita Y Chen, Laine E Thomas, Karen S Pieper, Kirk N Garratt, Eric D Peterson, L Kristin Newby, James A de Lemos, Mikhail N Kosiborod, Ezra A Amsterdam and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander C FanaroffDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC alexander.fanaroff@duke.edu.
Anita Y ChenDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Laine E ThomasDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Karen S PieperDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Kirk N GarrattCenter for Heart and Vascular Health, Christiania Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Eric D PetersonDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
L Kristin NewbyDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
James A de LemosDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas-Southwestern, Dallas, TX.
Mikhail N KosiborodSt Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
Ezra A AmsterdamDivision of Cardiology, University of California (Davis), Sacramento, CA.
Tracy Y WangDivision of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Duke University · USClinical Research Institute · USChristiana Care Health System · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) use for initially stable patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) varies widely across hospitals and minimally correlates with severity of illness. We aimed to develop a bedside risk score to assist in identifying high-risk patients with NSTEMI for ICU admission. METHODS AND

resultsUsing the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry linked to Medicare data, we identified patients with NSTEMI aged ≥65 years without cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest on presentation. Complications requiring ICU care were defined as subsequent development of cardiac arrest, shock, high-grade atrioventricular block, respiratory failure, stroke, or death during the index hospitalization. We developed and validated a model and integer risk score (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) ICU risk score) that uses variables present at hospital admission to predict requirement for ICU care. Of 29 973 patients with NSTEMI, 4282 (14%) developed a complication requiring ICU-level care, yet 12 879 (43%) received care in an ICU. Signs or symptoms of heart failure, initial heart rate, initial systolic blood pressure, initial troponin, initial serum creatinine, prior revascularization, chronic lung disease, ST-segment depression, and age had statistically significant associations with requirement for ICU care after adjusting for other risk factors. The ACTION ICU risk score had a C-statistic of 0.72. It identified 11% of patients as having very high risk (>30%) of developing complications requiring ICU care and 49% as having low likelihood (<10%) of requiring an ICU.

conclusionsThe ACTION ICU risk score quantifies the risk of initially stable patients with NSTEMI developing a complication requiring ICU care, and could be used to more effectively allocate limited ICU resources.

Indexed as

Critical CareDecision Support TechniquesHemodynamicsAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMedicareNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRegistriesReproducibility of Resultsintensive care unitmodelnon–ST‐segment acute coronary syndromerisk prediction risk scorerisk score

Identifiers

PMID29802146
PMCPMC6015341
OpenAlexW2803728491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.