Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29801485›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Assessing the community-level impact of a decade of user fee policy shifts on health facility deliveries in Kenya, 2003-2014.

Francis Obare, Timothy Abuya, Dennis Matanda, Ben Bellows

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francis ObarePopulation Council, Avenue 5, Rose Avenue, P.O. Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya. fonyango@popcouncil.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2353-8124
Timothy AbuyaPopulation Council, Avenue 5, Rose Avenue, P.O. Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya.
Dennis MatandaPopulation Council, Avenue 5, Rose Avenue, P.O. Box 17643, Nairobi, 00500, Kenya.
Ben BellowsPopulation Council, Plot #670, No. 4 Mwaleshi Road, Olympia Park, 101010, Lusaka, Zambia.
British Council · KENational HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council · ZMPopulation Council · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe long-term impact of user fee removal policies on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries may vary depending on the context in which they are implemented, including whether there are policy actions to support implementation. We examined the community-level impact of a decade of user fee policy shifts on health facility delivery among poorest and rural women and compared the changes with those among the richest and urban women in Kenya using data from three rounds of nationally representative surveys.

methodsData are from births occurring in the 5 years preceding the survey to women aged 15-49 years who were interviewed in the 2003, 2008-2009 and 2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Surveys. A total of 5949, 6079 and 20,964 births were reported in respective surveys. We conducted interrupted time series analysis predicting changes in quarterly proportions of births occurring in public and private health facilities as well as at home before and after the 2004, 2007 and 2013 user fee policy shifts in Kenya.

resultsThere were no statistically significant immediate changes in the proportion of births occurring in public facilities following the 2004, 2007 and 2013 user fee policy shifts among poor or rural women. There was, however, a statistically significant increase in home deliveries among all women and among those from the poorest households immediately following the 2004 policy. There was also a statistically significant increase in public facility deliveries among women from the two top quintiles, which was accompanied by a statistically decline in home deliveries immediately after the 2007 policy shift. Differences in trends in public facility deliveries between pre- and post-policy periods were not statistically significant for all sub-groups of women, indicating that even among the sub-group that experienced significant immediate increase after the 2007 policy shift, this pattern was not sustained over time.

conclusionThe findings of this paper provide empirical evidence that poorly implemented user fee removal policies benefit more well-off than poor women and in cases where there are significant immediate effects on uptake of facility delivery, this trend is not sustained over time.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDelivery, ObstetricFamily CharacteristicsFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHome ChildbirthHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisKenyaMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedPregnancyRural PopulationYoung AdultEconomically disadvantaged sub-groupsKenyaMaternal health service utilizationPolicy shiftsUser fee

Identifiers

PMID29801485
PMCPMC5970478
OpenAlexW2804395384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.