Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29801474›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2018

A Phase I clinical trial of EUS-guided intratumoral injection of the oncolytic virus, HF10 for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Yoshiki Hirooka, Hideki Kasuya, Takuya Ishikawa, Hiroki Kawashima, Eizaburo Ohno, Itzel B Villalobos, Yoshinori Naoe, Toru Ichinose, Nobuto Koyama, Maki Tanaka and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Development of adenovirus-based oncolytic virus to induce EBV lytic reactivation.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Oncolytic HSV and cancer drug interactions: Current clinical status and future directions.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  20. EGFR: New Insights on Its Activation and Mutation in Tumor and Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiki HirookaDepartment of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsuruma-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. hirooka@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Hideki KasuyaCancer Immune Therapy Research Center, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Takuya IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroki KawashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Eizaburo OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Itzel B VillalobosCancer Immune Therapy Research Center, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshinori NaoeCancer Immune Therapy Research Center, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Toru IchinoseCancer Immune Therapy Research Center, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nobuto KoyamaTakara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan.
Maki TanakaTakara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan.
Yasuhiro KoderaDepartment of Surgery II, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hidemi GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPTakara (Japan) · JPNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognosis of pancreatic cancer is poor with a 5-year survival rate of only 7%. Although several new chemotherapy treatments have shown promising results, all patients will eventually progress, and we need to develop newer chemotherapy treatments to improve response rates and overall survival (OS). HF10 is a spontaneously mutated oncolytic virus derived from a herpes simplex virus-1, and it has potential to show strong antitumor effect against malignancies without damaging normal tissue. We aimed to evaluate the safety and anti-tumor effectiveness in phase I dose-escalation trial of direct injection of HF10 into unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guidance in combination with erlotinib and gemcitabine administration. The mid-term results have been previously reported and here we report the final results of our study.

methodsThis was a single arm, open-label Phase I trial. HF10 was injected once every 2 weeks and continued up to four times in total unless dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) appears. A total of nine subjects in three Cohorts with dose-escalation were planned to be enrolled in this trial. The primary endpoint was the safety assessment and the secondary endpoint was the efficacy assessment.

resultsTwelve patients enrolled in this clinical trial, and ten subjects received this therapy. Five patients showed Grade III myelosuppression and two patients developed serious adverse events (AEs) (perforation of duodenum, hepatic dysfunction). However, all of these events were judged as AEs unrelated to HF10. Tumor responses were three partial responses (PR), four stable diseases (SD), and two progressive diseases (PD) out of nine subjects who completed the treatment. Target lesion responses were three PRs and six SDs. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months, whereas the median OS was 15.5 months. Two subjects from Cohort 1 and 2 showed downstaging and finally achieved surgical complete response (CR).

conclusionsHF10 direct injection under EUS-guidance in combination with erlotinib and gemcitabine was a safe treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Combination therapy of HF10 and chemotherapy should be explored further in large prospective studies.

trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (UMIN000010150) on March 4th, 2013.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineEndosonographyErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGemcitabineHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansInjections, IntralesionalMaleMiddle AgedMutationOncolytic VirotherapyDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabineEUS-guidanceHF10Oncolytic virusPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID29801474
PMCPMC5970460
OpenAlexW2807544832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.