ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018
Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05747144 (Multimodal Imaging in Vitreo-retinal Surgery and Macular Dystrophies), which is not on this map. Cited by 269 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multimodal Imaging in Vitreo-retinal Surgery and Macular Dystrophies: Biomarkers of Morpho-Functional Recovery by Artificial Intelligence
Who cites it
269 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 634 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare analytics perspectives on artificial intelligence-based retinopathy of prematurity screening: a bibliometric mapping study.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based algorithms for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning Approaches in High Myopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review of current algorithms.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Adherence of randomised controlled trials using artificial intelligence in ophthalmology to CONSORT-AI guidelines: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMJ health & care informatics · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Randomized Controlled Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Satisfactory Evaluation of Call Service Using AI After Ureteral Stent Insertion: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Assessment of Retinopathy of Prematurity Regression and Reactivation Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Vascular Severity Score.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Key factors in a rigorous longitudinal image-based assessment of retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Application of a Quantitative Vascular Severity Score in Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United States and India: New Insights Into Disease Epidemiology and Pathophysiology.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Data Volume and the Need for Clinical Decision Support in Glaucoma Care.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- The Algorithm's Blindspot: An Ethical Critique of Data-Fetishism and the Deskilling of the Clinical Gaze in Ophthalmology.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Validation of a Machine Learning Approach to the Analysis of Multifocal Electroretinograms for Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Transforming Pediatric Care Through AI: Bridging the Digital Divide in Health Informatics.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis of global output, networks, and frontiers [2016-2025].Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Leveraging deep learning to infer continuous predictions from ordinal labels in medical imaging.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. The decision to treat is primarily based on the presence of plus disease, defined as dilation and tortuosity of retinal vessels. However, clinical diagnosis of plus disease is highly subjective and variable. Objective: To implement and validate an algorithm based on deep learning to automatically diagnose plus disease from retinal photographs. Design, Setting, and Participants: A deep convolutional neural network was trained using a data set of 5511 retinal photographs. Each image was previously assigned a reference standard diagnosis (RSD) based on consensus of image grading by 3 experts and clinical diagnosis by 1 expert (ie, normal, pre-plus disease, or plus disease). The algorithm was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and tested on an independent set of 100 images. Images were collected from 8 academic institutions participating in the Imaging and Informatics in ROP (i-ROP) cohort study. The deep learning algorithm was tested against 8 ROP experts, each of whom had more than 10 years of clinical experience and more than 5 peer-reviewed publications about ROP. Data were collected from July 2011 to December 2016. Data were analyzed from December 2016 to September 2017. Exposures: A deep learning algorithm trained on retinal photographs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate performance of the algorithm against the RSD. Quadratic-weighted κ coefficients were calculated for ternary classification (ie, normal, pre-plus disease, and plus disease) to measure agreement with the RSD and 8 independent experts. Results: Of the 5511 included retinal photographs, 4535 (82.3%) were graded as normal, 805 (14.6%) as pre-plus disease, and 172 (3.1%) as plus disease, based on the RSD. Mean (SD) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistics were 0.94 (0.01) for the diagnosis of normal (vs pre-plus disease or plus disease) and 0.98 (0.01) for the diagnosis of plus disease (vs normal or pre-plus disease). For diagnosis of plus disease in an independent test set of 100 retinal images, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 93% with 94% specificity. For detection of pre-plus disease or worse, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 94%, respectively. On the same test set, the algorithm achieved a quadratic-weighted κ coefficient of 0.92 compared with the RSD, outperforming 6 of 8 ROP experts. Conclusions and Relevance: This fully automated algorithm diagnosed plus disease in ROP with comparable or better accuracy than human experts. This has potential applications in disease detection, monitoring, and prognosis in infants at risk of ROP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.