Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29801159›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018

Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

James M Brown, J Peter Campbell, Andrew Beers, Ken Chang, Susan Ostmo, R V Paul Chan, Jennifer Dy, Deniz Erdogmus, Stratis Ioannidis, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05747144 (Multimodal Imaging in Vitreo-retinal Surgery and Macular Dystrophies), which is not on this map. Cited by 269 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
269citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
47.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05747144 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Imaging in Vitreo-retinal Surgery and Macular Dystrophies: Biomarkers of Morpho-Functional Recovery by Artificial Intelligence

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2021 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsMacular Holes, Epiretinal Membrane, Retinal Detachment, Macular DystrophiesArmsBiometry, Retinography (Color) + Autofluorescence (AF), OCT B-scan and OCT angiography (OCTA), Microperimetry, Electrophysiological exams
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

269 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 634 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Current Trends in AI and Eye Disease Diagnostics.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

209 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

James M BrownAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown.
J Peter CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Andrew BeersAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown.
Ken ChangAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown.
Susan OstmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
R V Paul ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Jennifer DyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deniz ErdogmusDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stratis IoannidisDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity (i-ROP) Research Consortium
Massachusetts General Hospital · USNortheastern University · USOregon Health & Science University · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Project 4P41EB015896 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2018
$9.8M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
Neuroimaging Training ProgramT32EB001680 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRUCE R ROSEN · 2003 to 2026
$3.8M
Advanced Multimodal Neuroimaging Training GrantR90DA023427 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2006 to 2015
$2.8M
Advanced Multimodal Neuroimaging Training GrantT90DA022759 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2006 to 2015
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015896NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001680NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA023427NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA022759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. The decision to treat is primarily based on the presence of plus disease, defined as dilation and tortuosity of retinal vessels. However, clinical diagnosis of plus disease is highly subjective and variable. Objective: To implement and validate an algorithm based on deep learning to automatically diagnose plus disease from retinal photographs. Design, Setting, and Participants: A deep convolutional neural network was trained using a data set of 5511 retinal photographs. Each image was previously assigned a reference standard diagnosis (RSD) based on consensus of image grading by 3 experts and clinical diagnosis by 1 expert (ie, normal, pre-plus disease, or plus disease). The algorithm was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and tested on an independent set of 100 images. Images were collected from 8 academic institutions participating in the Imaging and Informatics in ROP (i-ROP) cohort study. The deep learning algorithm was tested against 8 ROP experts, each of whom had more than 10 years of clinical experience and more than 5 peer-reviewed publications about ROP. Data were collected from July 2011 to December 2016. Data were analyzed from December 2016 to September 2017. Exposures: A deep learning algorithm trained on retinal photographs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate performance of the algorithm against the RSD. Quadratic-weighted κ coefficients were calculated for ternary classification (ie, normal, pre-plus disease, and plus disease) to measure agreement with the RSD and 8 independent experts. Results: Of the 5511 included retinal photographs, 4535 (82.3%) were graded as normal, 805 (14.6%) as pre-plus disease, and 172 (3.1%) as plus disease, based on the RSD. Mean (SD) area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistics were 0.94 (0.01) for the diagnosis of normal (vs pre-plus disease or plus disease) and 0.98 (0.01) for the diagnosis of plus disease (vs normal or pre-plus disease). For diagnosis of plus disease in an independent test set of 100 retinal images, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 93% with 94% specificity. For detection of pre-plus disease or worse, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 94%, respectively. On the same test set, the algorithm achieved a quadratic-weighted κ coefficient of 0.92 compared with the RSD, outperforming 6 of 8 ROP experts. Conclusions and Relevance: This fully automated algorithm diagnosed plus disease in ROP with comparable or better accuracy than human experts. This has potential applications in disease detection, monitoring, and prognosis in infants at risk of ROP.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPhotographyAlgorithmsDeep LearningFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetinal VesselsRetinopathy of PrematurityROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID29801159
PMCPMC6136045
OpenAlexW2800012666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.