Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29801093›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2018

Association Between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Nonfatal and Fatal Drug Overdoses: A Systematic Review.

David S Fink, Julia P Schleimer, Aaron Sarvet, Kiran K Grover, Chris Delcher, Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia, June H Kim, Ariadne E Rivera-Aguirre, Stephen G Henry, Silvia S Martins and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improving Policy Evaluations Of The Opioid Crisis.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David S FinkColumbia University, New York, New York (D.S.F., J.P.S., A.S., K.K.G., S.S.M.).
Julia P SchleimerColumbia University, New York, New York (D.S.F., J.P.S., A.S., K.K.G., S.S.M.).
Aaron SarvetColumbia University, New York, New York (D.S.F., J.P.S., A.S., K.K.G., S.S.M.).
Kiran K GroverColumbia University, New York, New York (D.S.F., J.P.S., A.S., K.K.G., S.S.M.).
Chris DelcherUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (C.D.).
Alvaro Castillo-CarnigliaUniversity of California, Davis, Sacramento, California (A.C., A.E.R., S.G.H., M.C.).
June H KimNew York University, New York, New York (J.H.K.).
Ariadne E Rivera-AguirreUniversity of California, Davis, Sacramento, California (A.C., A.E.R., S.G.H., M.C.).
Stephen G HenryUniversity of California, Davis, Sacramento, California (A.C., A.E.R., S.G.H., M.C.).
Silvia S MartinsColumbia University, New York, New York (D.S.F., J.P.S., A.S., K.K.G., S.S.M.).
Magdalena CerdáUniversity of California, Davis, Sacramento, California (A.C., A.E.R., S.G.H., M.C.).

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Opioid-Related HarmR01DA039962 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CERDA, MAGDALENA · 2016 to 2018
$1.3M
A clinician training intervention to improve pain-related communication, pain management and opioid prescribing in primary careK23DA043052 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HENRY, STEPHEN G · 2017 to 2019
$591k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA043052NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039962NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are a key component of the president's Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Plan to prevent opioid overdoses in the United States. Purpose: To examine whether PDMP implementation is associated with changes in nonfatal and fatal overdoses; identify features of programs differentially associated with those outcomes; and investigate any potential unintended consequences of the programs. Data Sources: Eligible publications from MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect (Clarivate Analytics), Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics), Social Sciences Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics), and ProQuest Dissertations indexed through 27 December 2017 and additional studies from reference lists. Study Selection: Observational studies (published in English) from U.S. states that examined an association between PDMP implementation and nonfatal or fatal overdoses. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently extracted data from and rated the risk of bias (ROB) of studies by using established criteria. Consensus determinations involving all investigators were used to grade strength of evidence for each intervention. Data Synthesis: Of 2661 records, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles examined PDMP implementation only (n = 8), program features only (n = 2), PDMP implementation and program features (n = 5), PDMP implementation with mandated provider review combined with pain clinic laws (n = 1), and PDMP robustness (n = 1). Evidence from 3 studies was insufficient to draw conclusions regarding an association between PDMP implementation and nonfatal overdoses. Low-strength evidence from 10 studies suggested a reduction in fatal overdoses with PDMP implementation. Program features associated with a decrease in overdose deaths included mandatory provider review, provider authorization to access PDMP data, frequency of reports, and monitoring of nonscheduled drugs. Three of 6 studies found an increase in heroin overdoses after PDMP implementation. Limitation: Few studies, high ROB, and heterogeneous analytic methods and outcome measurement. Conclusion: Evidence that PDMP implementation either increases or decreases nonfatal or fatal overdoses is largely insufficient, as is evidence regarding positive associations between specific administrative features and successful programs. Some evidence showed unintended consequences. Research is needed to identify a set of "best practices" and complementary initiatives to address these consequences. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Drug Abuse and Bureau of Justice Assistance.

Indexed as

Prescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsDrug OverdoseHumansOpioid-Related DisordersProgram EvaluationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29801093
PMCPMC6015770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.