Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29801062›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2018

Association Between Changes in Body Composition and Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer.

Marta Sandini, Manuel Patino, Cristina R Ferrone, Carlos A Alvarez-Pérez, Kim C Honselmann, Salvatore Paiella, Matteo Catania, Luca Riva, Giorgia Tedesco, Raffaella Casolino and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sarcopenia among treated cancer patients before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. When adipose meets inflammation: a novel adiposity-inflammation signature predicts prognosis and chemotherapy benefit in locally advanced gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. From Routine Imaging to Risk Stratification: Multimodal Vision-Language Survival Modeling for Pancreatic Cancer.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta SandiniDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Manuel PatinoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cristina R FerroneDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carlos A Alvarez-PérezDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kim C HonselmannDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Salvatore PaiellaDepartment of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Matteo CataniaDepartment of Radiology, The Pancreas Institute, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Luca RivaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Giorgia TedescoDepartment of Radiology, The Pancreas Institute, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Raffaella CasolinoDepartment of Oncology, The Pancreas Institute, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Alessandra AuriemmaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Maria C SalandiniDepartment of Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Giulia CarraraDepartment of Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Giulia CristelDepartment of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Anna DamascelliDepartment of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Davide IppolitoDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Mirko D'OnofrioDepartment of Radiology, The Pancreas Institute, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Keith D LillemoeDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Claudio BassiDepartment of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Marco BragaDepartment of Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Luca GianottiDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Dushyant SahaniDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carlos Fernández-Del CastilloDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Verona · ITHarvard University · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity have been associated with poor outcomes in unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). Neoadjuvant treatment (NT) is used increasingly to improve resectability; however, its effects on fat and muscle body composition have not been characterized. Objectives: To evaluate whether NT affects muscle mass and adipose tissue in patients with borderline resectable PC (BRPC) and locally advanced PC (LAPC) and determine whether there were potential differences between patients who ultimately underwent resection and those who did not. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study conducted at 4 academic medical centers, 193 patients with BRPC and LAPC undergoing surgical exploration after NT who had available computed tomographic scans (both at diagnosis and preoperatively) and confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were evaluated. The study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2015. Data analysis was performed from September 2016 to May 2017. Measurement of body compartments was evaluated with volume assessment software before and after NT. A radiologist blinded to the patient outcome assessed the areas of skeletal muscle, total adipose tissue, and visceral adipose tissue through a standardized protocol. Exposures: Receipt of NT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Achievement of pancreatic resection at surgical exploration after the receipt of NT. Results: Of the 193 patients with complete radiologic imaging available after NT, 96 (49.7%) were women; mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 64 (11) years. Most patients received combined therapy with fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and folic acid (124 [64.2%]) and 86 (44.6%) received chemoradiotherapy as well. The median interval between pre-NT and post-NT imaging was 6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4-7 months). All body compartments significantly changed. The adipose compound decreased (median total adipose tissue area from 284.0 cm2; IQR, 171.0-414.0 to 250.0 cm2; IQR, 139.0-363.0; P < .001; median visceral adipose tissue area from 115.2 cm2; IQR, 59.9-191.0 to 97.7 cm2; IQR, 48.0-149.0 cm2; P < .001), whereas the lean mass slightly improved (median skeletal muscle from 122.1 cm2; IQR, 99.3-142.0 to 123 cm2; IQR 104.8-152.5 cm2; P = .001). Surgical resection was achievable in 136 (70.5%) patients. Patients who underwent resection had experienced a 5.9% skeletal muscle area increase during NT treatment, whereas those who did not undergo resection had a 1.7% decrease (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with PC experience a significant loss of adipose tissue during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but no muscle wasting. An increase in muscle tissue during NT is associated with resectability.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingAntineoplastic AgentsBody CompositionChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29801062
PMCPMC6583880
OpenAlexW2802732717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.