Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29801011›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Effect of Intravesical Instillation of Gemcitabine vs Saline Immediately Following Resection of Suspected Low-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Tumor Recurrence: SWOG S0337 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Edward M Messing, Catherine M Tangen, Seth P Lerner, Deepak M Sahasrabudhe, Theresa M Koppie, David P Wood, Philip C Mack, Robert S Svatek, Christopher P Evans, Khaled S Hafez and 9 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00445601 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Blinded Study of Immediate Post TURBT Instillation of Gemcitabine Versus Saline in Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Occasionally Recurring Grade I/II Superficial Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2007 to 2017Enrolled406ConditionsBladder CancerArmsgemcitabine hydrochloride, placebo
NCT05547516 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Blue Laser-5ALA-photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in the Prevention of Postoperative Tumor Recurrence in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled140ConditionsNon-muscle-invasive Bladder CancerArmsStandard infusion chemotherapy, BL - 5 ala PDT
NCT06889623 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Immediate Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Chemotherapy Following Resection for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: an Open-label, Single-arm, Prospective Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2024 to 2028Enrolled72ConditionsNMIBCArmsImmediate postoperative chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biomedical reports · 2025
    Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Edward M MessingUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Catherine M TangenSWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Seth P LernerBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Deepak M SahasrabudheUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Theresa M KoppieOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
David P WoodBeaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Philip C MackUniversity of California Davis, Sacramento.
Robert S SvatekUniversity of Texas-San Antonio, San Antonio.
Christopher P EvansUniversity of California Davis, Sacramento.
Khaled S HafezUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Daniel J CulkinUniversity of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City.
Timothy C BrandMadigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.
Lawrence I KarshUrology Center of Colorado, Denver.
Jeffrey M HolzbeierleinUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City.
Shandra S WilsonUniversity of Colorado, Aurora.
Guan WuUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Melissa PletsSWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Nicholas J VogelzangComprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Ian M ThompsonCHRISTUS Santa Rosa Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.
University of Rochester · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USUniversity of California, Davis · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBeaumont Health · USChristus Santa Rosa Health System · USComprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USOklahoma City University · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Kansas Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USThe Urology Center of Colorado · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DAWN HERSHMAN, PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MEGAN OTHUS · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
The Pacific Cancer Research Consortium (PCRC), an NCORP Community SiteUG1CA189953 · NCI · SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER, FIRST HILL · PI Alison Katherine Conlin, Charles Drescher · 2014 to 2026
$27.4M
Gulf South Minority/Underserved Clinical Trials Network (Gulf South M/U CTN)UG1CA189854 · NCI · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI AUGUSTO C. OCHOA · 2014 to 2026
$27.1M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP)U10CA180858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUNT, KELLY K, PINNIX, CHELSEA CAMILLE · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
SWOG GRANT APPLICATION FOR LOYOLA UNIVERSITYU10CA046282 · NCI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI STIFF, PATRICK J · 1988 to 2013
$5.4M
Huntsman Cancer Institute/ University of Utah Network Lead Academic Participating Site ApplicationUG1CA233178 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Matthew Poppe, Heloisa Prado Soares · 2019 to 2026
$4.9M
University of Colorado NTCN Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) U10CA180834 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ELIAS, ANTHONY D · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
UM LAPs- U10 GrantU10CA180801 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZALUPSKI, MARK M · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
UCDCCC NCTN UG1 PROGRAMUG1CA233340 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GANDARA, DAVID R, VALICENTI, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CA004919NCI NIH HHS P20 CA233374NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS U10 CA022433NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037981NCI NIH HHS U10 CA046113NCI NIH HHS U10 CA046282NCI NIH HHS U10 CA058416NCI NIH HHS U10 CA068183NCI NIH HHS U10 CA128567NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180801NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180818NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180834NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180846NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189854NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189953NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233178NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer frequently recurs after excision by transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Objective: To determine whether immediate post-TURBT intravesical instillation of gemcitabine reduces recurrence of suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer compared with saline. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized double-blind clinical trial conducted at 23 US centers. Patients with suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer based on cystoscopic appearance without any high-grade or without more than 2 low-grade urothelial cancer episodes within 18 months before index TURBT were enrolled between January 23, 2008, and August 14, 2012, and followed up every 3 months with cystoscopy and cytology for 2 years and then semiannually for 2 years. Patients were monitored for tumor recurrence, progression to muscle invasion, survival, and toxic effects. The final date of follow-up was August 14, 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive intravesical instillation of gemcitabine (2 g in 100 mL of saline) (n = 201) or saline (100 mL) (n = 205) for 1 hour immediately following TURBT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to recurrence of cancer. Secondary end points were time to muscle invasion and death due to any cause. Results: Among 406 randomized eligible patients (median age, 66 years; 84.7% men), 383 completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 67 of 201 patients (4-year estimate, 35%) in the gemcitabine group and 91 of 205 patients (4-year estimate, 47%) in the saline group had cancer recurrence within 4.0 years (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; P<.001 by 1-sided log-rank test for time to recurrence). Among the 215 patients with low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer who underwent TURBT and drug instillation, 34 of 102 patients (4-year estimate, 34%) in the gemcitabine group and 59 of 113 patients (4-year estimate, 54%) in the saline group had cancer recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P = .001 by 1-sided log-rank test for time to recurrence). Fifteen patients had tumors that progressed to muscle invasion (5 in the gemcitabine group and 10 in the saline group; P = .22 by 1-sided log-rank test) and 42 died of any cause (17 in the gemcitabine group and 25 in the saline group; P = .12 by 1-sided log-rank test). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events and no significant differences in adverse events of grade 3 or lower. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, immediate postresection intravesical instillation of gemcitabine, compared with instillation of saline, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence over a median of 4.0 years. These findings support using this therapy, but further research is needed to compare gemcitabine with other intravesical agents. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00445601.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravesicalAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCarcinoma, PapillaryDeoxycytidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSodium ChlorideAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineGemcitabineSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID29801011
PMCPMC6583489
OpenAlexW2801008036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.