Trial reportJAMA2018
Effect of Intravesical Instillation of Gemcitabine vs Saline Immediately Following Resection of Suspected Low-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Tumor Recurrence: SWOG S0337 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Blinded Study of Immediate Post TURBT Instillation of Gemcitabine Versus Saline in Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Occasionally Recurring Grade I/II Superficial Bladder Cancer
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Blue Laser-5ALA-photodynamic Therapy (PDT) in the Prevention of Postoperative Tumor Recurrence in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
Impact of Immediate Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Chemotherapy Following Resection for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: an Open-label, Single-arm, Prospective Trial
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment and surveillance for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a clinical practice guideline (2021 edition).Military Medical Research · 2022Guideline
- Race reporting and disparities regarding clinical trials in bladder cancer: a systematic review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Pooled it
- Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: An abridged Cochrane Review.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Pooled it
- Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Intravesical gemcitabine versus mitomycin for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.BMC urology · 2020Pooled it
- Treatment of Low-grade Intermediate-risk Nonmuscle-invasive Bladder Cancer With UGN-102 ± Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Compared to Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Monotherapy: A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Trial (ATLAS).The Journal of urology · 2023Trial
- Use of Intravesical Chemotherapy in the US Following Publication of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Localized nanomedicine for urologic cancers: anatomy-guided design and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Future science OA · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Paradoxical Tumor-Suppressive Role of CCL2/CCR2 in Bladder Cancer: A Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategy.Cancers · 2026Article
- Chemical efflux imaging using an annular nanosensor array for in situ bladder cancer detection.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Radiotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Delivery of Multifunctional Microspheres via Intravesical Instillation for Bladder Carcinoma: Therapeutic Potential and Mechanistic Insights.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Narrative Review Across Risk Groups.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- The efficacy and safety of interval and post-reTURBT intravesical therapy for bladder cancer.iScience · 2025Article
- Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems in urologic oncology: From targeted therapy to precision theranostics.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: molecular landscape, treatment strategies and emerging therapies.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- A practical overview and statistical analysis of interval-censored data in cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer frequently recurs after excision by transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Objective: To determine whether immediate post-TURBT intravesical instillation of gemcitabine reduces recurrence of suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer compared with saline. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized double-blind clinical trial conducted at 23 US centers. Patients with suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer based on cystoscopic appearance without any high-grade or without more than 2 low-grade urothelial cancer episodes within 18 months before index TURBT were enrolled between January 23, 2008, and August 14, 2012, and followed up every 3 months with cystoscopy and cytology for 2 years and then semiannually for 2 years. Patients were monitored for tumor recurrence, progression to muscle invasion, survival, and toxic effects. The final date of follow-up was August 14, 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive intravesical instillation of gemcitabine (2 g in 100 mL of saline) (n = 201) or saline (100 mL) (n = 205) for 1 hour immediately following TURBT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to recurrence of cancer. Secondary end points were time to muscle invasion and death due to any cause. Results: Among 406 randomized eligible patients (median age, 66 years; 84.7% men), 383 completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 67 of 201 patients (4-year estimate, 35%) in the gemcitabine group and 91 of 205 patients (4-year estimate, 47%) in the saline group had cancer recurrence within 4.0 years (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; P<.001 by 1-sided log-rank test for time to recurrence). Among the 215 patients with low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer who underwent TURBT and drug instillation, 34 of 102 patients (4-year estimate, 34%) in the gemcitabine group and 59 of 113 patients (4-year estimate, 54%) in the saline group had cancer recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P = .001 by 1-sided log-rank test for time to recurrence). Fifteen patients had tumors that progressed to muscle invasion (5 in the gemcitabine group and 10 in the saline group; P = .22 by 1-sided log-rank test) and 42 died of any cause (17 in the gemcitabine group and 25 in the saline group; P = .12 by 1-sided log-rank test). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events and no significant differences in adverse events of grade 3 or lower. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with suspected low-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, immediate postresection intravesical instillation of gemcitabine, compared with instillation of saline, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence over a median of 4.0 years. These findings support using this therapy, but further research is needed to compare gemcitabine with other intravesical agents. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00445601.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.