ArticleJAMA oncology2018
Speed of Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors of Programmed Cell Death 1 Protein and Comparison of Patient Ages in Clinical Practice vs Pivotal Clinical Trials.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Racial disparities and utilization trends of first-line targeted therapies for metastatic breast cancer.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Outcomes in NSCLC Across Populations and Practice Settings.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- The impact of immunotherapy on reductions in cancer mortality: Evidence from Medicare.Journal of health economics · 2026Article
- Changes in prescribing patterns and access to immune checkpoint inhibitors in german lung cancer patients - a claims data analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Off-Label Use of First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2025Article
- Association of systemic therapy with survival among adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- The performance status gap in immunotherapy for frail patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Article
- Real-world patient characteristics and treatment patterns in US patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Observational
- Article
- Systematic analysis of off-label and off-guideline cancer therapy usage in a real-world cohort of 165,912 US patients.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- The association between toxicity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with NSCLC.Immunotherapy · 2024Article
- Discovery of a potent, selective, and tumor-suppressing antibody antagonist of adenosine A2A receptor.PloS one · 2024Article
- Sociodemographic associations with uptake of novel therapies for acute myeloid leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Clinicogenomic factors and treatment patterns among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases in the United States.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Disparities in immune and targeted therapy utilization for older US patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Disparity in checkpoint inhibitor utilization among commercially insured adult patients with metastatic lung cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Association Between Age and Survival Trends in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Adoption of Immunotherapy.JAMA oncology · 2023Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is increasing its pace of approvals for novel cancer therapeutics, including for immune checkpoint inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 protein (anti-PD-1 agents). However, little is known about how quickly anti-PD-1 agents agents reach eligible patients in practice or whether such patients differ from those studied in clinical trials that lead to FDA approval (pivotal clinical trials). Objectives: To assess the speed with which anti-PD-1 agents agents reached eligible patients in practice and to compare the ages of patients treated in clinical practice with the ages of those treated in pivotal clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study, performed from January 1, 2011, through August 31, 2016, included patients from the Flatiron Health Network who were eligible for anti-PD-1 agents treatment of selected cancer types, which included melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Main Outcomes and Measures: Cumulative proportions of eligible patients receiving anti-PD-1 agents treatment and their age distributions. Results: The study identified 3089 patients who were eligible for anti-PD-1 agents treatment (median age, 66 [interquartile range, 56-75] years for patients with melanoma, 66 [interquartile range, 58-72] years for patients with RCC, and 67 [interquartile range, 59-74] years for patients with NSCLC; 1742 male [56.4%] and 1347 [43.6%] female; 2066 [66.9%] white). Of these patients, 2123 (68.7%) received anti-PD-1 agents treatment, including 439 eligible patients with melanoma (79.1%), 1417 eligible patients with NSCLC (65.6%), and 267 eligible patients with RCC (71.2%). Within 4 months after FDA approval, greater than 60% of eligible patients in each cohort had received anti-PD-1 agents treatment. Overall, similar proportions of older and younger patients received anti-PD-1 agents treatment during the first 9 months after FDA approval. However, there were significant differences in age between clinical trial participants and patients receiving anti-PD-1 agents treatment in clinical practice, with more patients being older than 65 years in clinical practice (range, 327 of 1365 [60.6%] to 46 of 72 [63.9%]) than in pivotal clinical trials (range, 38 of 120 [31.7%] to 223 of 544 [41.0%]; all P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Anti-PD-1 agents rapidly reached patients in clinical practice, and patients treated in clinical practice differed significantly from patients treated in pivotal clinical trials. Future actions are needed to ensure that rapid adoption occurs on the basis of representative trial evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.