Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800865›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2018

Cryptic binding sites on proteins: definition, detection, and druggability.

Sandor Vajda, Dmitri Beglov, Amanda E Wakefield, Megan Egbert, Adrian Whitty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cancer-associated TRF1 mutations alter PARP1 interaction dynamics: an in silico study.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Computational Ligand-Binding Site Prediction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandor VajdaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: vajda@bu.edu.
Dmitri BeglovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Amanda E WakefieldDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Megan EgbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Adrian WhittyDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: awhitty@bu.edu.

Funding

Analysis and Prediction of Molecular InteractionsR35GM118078 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SANDOR VAJDA · 2016 to 2026
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many proteins in their unbound structures lack surface pockets appropriately sized for drug binding. Hence, a variety of experimental and computational tools have been developed for the identification of cryptic sites that are not evident in the unbound protein but form upon ligand binding, and can provide tractable drug target sites. The goal of this review is to discuss the definition, detection, and druggability of such sites, and their potential value for drug discovery. Novel methods based on molecular dynamics simulations are particularly promising and yield a large number of transient pockets, but it has been shown that only a minority of such sites are generally capable of binding ligands with substantial affinity. Based on recent studies, current methodology can be improved by combining molecular dynamics with fragment docking and machine learning approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesComputer-Aided DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsMachine LearningMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID29800865
PMCPMC6088748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.