Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800408›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2018

Empowering Latina breast cancer patients to make informed decisions about clinical trials: a pilot study.

Patricia Chalela, Edgar Muñoz, Kipling J Gallion, Virginia Kaklamani, Amelie G Ramirez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development and evaluation of a sustainable video health education program for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in Malaysia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia ChalelaInstitute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Edgar MuñozInstitute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Kipling J GallionInstitute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Virginia KaklamaniCancer Therapy and Research Center, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Amelie G RamirezInstitute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
Training ProgramU54CA153511 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI RAMIREZ, AMELIE G · 2010 to 2015
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minority representation in clinical trials is vital for researchers to assess differential effects in outcomes of therapies on biological and genetic characteristics among groups. This study assessed the effect of Choices, a bilingual multi-component intervention, on perceived understanding of clinical trials, agreement with stages of decision readiness and consideration of clinical trials as a treatment option, among Latina breast cancer patients. This randomized controlled pilot study compared Choices with a control condition providing general clinical trial information to eligible patients. Seventy-seven Latina breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to either Choices (n = 38) or the control (n = 39). Choices included three components: an educational interactive video, a low-literacy booklet, and care coordination by patient navigation (i.e., educational and psychosocial support, coordinating appointments, translating, interacting with the medical team). Choices was more effective than the control in improving perceived understanding of clinical trials (p = .033) and increasing consideration of clinical trials as a treatment option (p = .008). Additionally, intervention participants showed significant changes between baseline and post-intervention on agreement with stages of decision readiness statements (p < .002) than control participants (p > .05); the percentage of intervention women in agreement with preparation to action statements increased from 52.8% at baseline to 86.1% at post-intervention, and those in agreement with ready to action stages rose from 50.0% to 88.9%. Computer-based videos and care coordination provided by patient navigation-specifically tailored to Latinos-are effective strategies to successfully address awareness, and improved decision-making skills to make informed decisions about clinical trial participation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient Education as TopicPatient NavigationBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicComprehensionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPower, PsychologicalSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID29800408
PMCPMC6257071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.