ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2018
A mixed-methods analysis of the capacity of the Patient-Centered Medical Home to implement care coordination services for cancer survivors.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using co-design to develop actionable strategies to identify and follow-up on breast cancer survivors in primary care.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Exploring transitions in care for individuals living with and beyond cancer: A qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Identifying Patients with Breast Cancer History Using Epic Electronic Health Record.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Functional Stratification and Long-Term Care Service Patterns among Discharged Patients with Cancer: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- The association between a patient-centered quality of care index and self-efficacy among cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Team complexity and care coordination for cancer survivors with multiple chronic conditions: a mixed methods study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Using Stakeholder Engagement to Build Cancer Survivorship Care Coordination Capacity Between Primary and Oncology Care.Health equity · 2025Article
- Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Integrating primary care and childhood cancer survivorship care: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- A Novel Mixed Methods Approach Combining Geospatial Mapping and Qualitative Inquiry to Identify Multilevel Policy Targets: The Focused Rapid Assessment Process (fRAP) Applied to Cancer Survivorship.Journal of mixed methods research · 2022Article
- Defining a patient-centered approach to cancer survivorship care: development of the patient centered survivorship care index (PC-SCI).BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Developing personalized survivorship care pathways in the United States: Existing resources and remaining challenges.Cancer · 2021Article
- Cancer Survivorship Care Roles for Primary Care Physicians.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- Understanding primary care-oncology relationships within a changing healthcare environment.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Cancer care coordination: opportunities for healthcare delivery research.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Article
- Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are currently 15.5 million cancer survivors in USA who are increasingly relying on primary care providers for their care. Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) have the potential to meet the unique needs of cancer survivors; but, few studies have examined PCMH attributes as potential resources for delivering survivorship care. This study assesses the current care coordination infrastructure in advanced PCMHs, known to be innovative, and explores their capacity to provide cancer survivorship care. We conducted comparative case studies of a purposive sample (n = 9) of PCMHs to examine current care coordination infrastructure and capacity through a mixed- methods analysis. Data included qualitative interviews, quantitative surveys, and fieldnotes collected during 10- to 12-day onsite observations at each practice. Case studies included practices in five states with diverse business models and settings. Eight of the nine practices had National Committee for Quality Assurance Level 3 PCMH recognition. No practices had implemented a systematic approach to cancer survivorship care. We found all practices had a range of electronic population health management tools, care coordinator roles in place for chronic conditions, and strategies or protocols for tracking and managing complex disease groups. We identified potential capacity, as well as barriers, to provide cancer survivorship care using existing care coordination infrastructure developed for other chronic conditions. This existing infrastructure suggests the potential to translate care coordination elements within primary care settings to accelerate the implementation of systematic survivorship care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.