Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800338›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2019

Brief Counseling for Veterans with Musculoskeletal Disorder, Risky Substance Use, and Service Connection Claims.

Marc I Rosen, William C Becker, Anne C Black, Steve Martino, Ellen L Edens, Robert D Kerns

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Access to Pain Care From Compensation Clinics: A Relational Coordination Perspective.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc I RosenDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
William C BeckerVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
Anne C BlackDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Steve MartinoDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ellen L EdensDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Robert D KernsDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
VA Connecticut Healthcare System · USYale University · US

Funding

SBIRT (Pain Management) for Veterans Filing Compensation ClaimsR34AT008318 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ROSEN, MARC I · 2013 to 2015
$548k
NCCIH NIH HHS R34 AT008318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh proportions of post-9/11 veterans have musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), but engaging them in care early in their course of illness has been challenging. The service connection application is an ideal point of contact for referring veterans to early interventions for their conditions.

designAmong MSD claimants who reported risky substance use, we pilot-tested a counseling intervention targeting pain and risky substance use called Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment-Pain Module (SBIRT-PM). Veterans were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1 ratio to SBIRT-PM, Pain Module counseling only, or treatment as usual (TAU).

methodsParticipants assigned to either counseling arm were offered a single meeting with a study therapist with two follow-up telephone calls as needed. Participants completed outcome assessments at four and 12 weeks after randomization.

resultsOf 257 veterans evaluated, 101 reported risky substance use and were randomized. Counseling was attended by 75% of veterans offered it and was well received. VA pain-related services were used by 51% of participants in either of the pain-focused conditions but only by 27% in TAU (P < 0.04). Starting with average pain severity ratings of 5.1/10 at baseline, only minimal changes in mean pain severity were noted regardless of condition. Self-reported risky substance use was significantly lower over time in the SBIRT-PM condition relative to the two other conditions (P < 0.02). At week 12, proportions of veterans reporting risky substance use were 0.39, 0.69, and 0.71 for the SBIRT-PM, Pain Module counseling, and TAU conditions, respectively.

conclusionsSBIRT-PM shows promise as a way to engage veterans in pain treatment and reduce substance use.

Indexed as

AdultCounselingFemaleHumansMaleMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainPain ManagementPilot ProjectsSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesVeteransAddictionChronic PainDisabilityMusculoskeletal DisorderPainVeterans

Identifiers

PMID29800338
PMCPMC6387983
OpenAlexW2804136504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.