Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800314›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2018

Human Experimental Challenge With Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Elicits Immune Responses to Canonical and Novel Antigens Relevant to Vaccine Development.

Subhra Chakraborty, Arlo Randall, Tim J Vickers, Doug Molina, Clayton D Harro, Barbara DeNearing, Jessica Brubaker, David A Sack, A Louis Bourgeois, Philip L Felgner and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A proteome-wide atlas of humoral immunity toFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Controlled Human Infection Model for Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Subhra ChakrabortyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Arlo RandallAntigen Discovery, Inc. (ADI), Irvine, California.
Tim J VickersDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Doug MolinaAntigen Discovery, Inc. (ADI), Irvine, California.
Clayton D HarroJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Barbara DeNearingJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jessica BrubakerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
David A SackJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
A Louis BourgeoisPATH, Washington, DC.
Philip L FelgnerAntigen Discovery, Inc. (ADI), Irvine, California.
Xiaowu LiangAntigen Discovery, Inc. (ADI), Irvine, California.
Sachin ManiPATH, Washington, DC.
Heather WenzelPATH, Washington, DC.
R Reid TownsendDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipid Research, Washington University School of Medicine.
Petra E GilmoreDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipid Research, Washington University School of Medicine.
Michael J DarsleyMD Biologic Consulting Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David A RaskoThe Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
James M FleckensteinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Johns Hopkins University · USAntigen Discovery (United States) · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USJohn Cochran VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Novel Antigen Identification for an Enterotoxigenic E. coli VaccineR01AI089894 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Zachary T. Berndsen, James Michael Fleckenstein · 2010 to 2026
$7.4M
Molecular Microbiology of Enterotoxigenic E. coli Pathogen-Host InteractionsR01AI126887 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FLECKENSTEIN, JAMES MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
BLRD VA I01 BX001469NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI089894NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI126887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is a major cause of diarrheal illness in the developing world. Enterotoxigenic E coli vaccinology has been challenged by genetic diversity and heterogeneity of canonical antigens. Examination of the antigenic breadth of immune responses associated with protective immunity could afford new avenues for vaccine development. Methods: Antibody lymphocyte supernatants (ALS) and sera from 20 naive human volunteers challenged with ETEC strain H10407 and from 10 volunteers rechallenged 4-6 weeks later with the same strain (9 of whom were completely protected on rechallenge) were tested against ETEC proteome microarrays containing 957 antigens. Results: Enterotoxigenic E coli challenge stimulated robust serum and mucosal (ALS) responses to canonical vaccine antigens (CFA/I, and the B subunit of LT) as well as a small number of antigens not presently targeted in ETEC vaccines. These included pathovar-specific secreted proteins (EtpA, EatA) as well as highly conserved E coli antigens including YghJ, flagellin, and pertactin-like autotransporter proteins, all of which have previously afforded protection against ETEC infection in preclinical studies. Conclusions: Taken together, studies reported here suggest that immune responses after ETEC infection involve traditional vaccine targets as well as a select number of more recently identified protein antigens that could offer additional avenues for vaccine development for these pathogens.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCarrier ProteinsEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsEscherichia coli VaccinesHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsPeptide HydrolasesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCarrier ProteinsEatA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsEscherichia coli VaccinesEtpA protein, E coliMembrane GlycoproteinsPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID29800314
PMCPMC6151082
OpenAlexW2804988832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.