Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800295›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients aged ≥60 years (EXTEND): analysis of cost-effectiveness.

Oliver A Cornely, Maureen Watt, Charles McCrea, Simon D Goldenberg, Enrico De Nigris

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04070352 (Evaluation of Fidaxomicin in the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04070352 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Fidaxomicin in the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2019 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsClostridium Difficile Infection (CDI)ArmsFidaxomicin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Real-world use of bezlotoxumab to prevent recurrentTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Insights into the Evolving Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Fidaxomicin to prevent recurrentJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cost-effectiveness of bezlotoxumab and fidaxomicin for initial Clostridioides difficile infection.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  9. High Prevalence of Genetically RelatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Predictors and burden of hospital readmission with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a French nation-wide inception cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in patients 60 years and older with Clostridium difficile infection: cost-effectiveness analysis in Spain.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Recent advances in the treatment ofInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver A CornelyDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, ZKS Köln, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.
Maureen WattAstellas Pharma, Inc., Chertsey, UK.
Charles McCreaPAREXEL Access Consulting, London, UK.
Simon D GoldenbergCentre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Enrico De NigrisAstellas Pharma, Inc., Chertsey, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. Methods: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (£1356 versus £260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; £10 815 versus £11 459/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (£694 versus £1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost £53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. Conclusions: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridium InfectionsEnglandFemaleFidaxomicinHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsFidaxomicinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID29800295
PMCPMC6105871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.