Trial reportJAMA2018
Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence.
Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 155 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial
Recurrence Rate and Risk Factors After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric and Intestinal Polyps: A Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
155 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 295 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of fecal bile acids on the incidence and risk-stratification of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Where do we stand with screening for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma based on serum protein biomarkers? A systematic review.Molecular oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Yield of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults with a History of Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Findings from the first colorectal cancer screening among 103 542 individuals in Vietnam with systematic review of colorectal cancer screening programs in Asia-Pacific region.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 2.2020.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2020Guideline
- Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020Guideline
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of MUC1 Peptide Vaccine for Prevention of Recurrent Colorectal Adenoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Trial
- Evaluation of Polyp Detection Rates Following Changes in Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Bridging the Precancerous Gap in Colorectal Cancer Through AI-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy, Endoscopy, and Digital Pathology.Cancers · 2026Review
- An Unusual Cause of Melena: Adjacent Sigmoid Tubular Adenomas With Moderate Dysplasia-A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was comparable between patients with 1-2 and 3-4 non-advanced adenomas removed during screening colonoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary team-guided combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery for complex colonic lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Association Between Colorectal Neoplasia and Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Individuals.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Exploring an Intermediate Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Based on Stool Proteomics and Machine Learning for Optimizing the Selection of Patients for Colonoscopy Identified From FIT.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Impact of Diet and Drugs on Fecal Lachnoclostridium Gene Marker (m3) in Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasia.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Deciding on surveillance colonoscopy: a multi-phase study of a conversation aid for older adults.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Individuals with adenomatous polyps are advised to undergo repeated colonoscopy surveillance to prevent subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC), but the relationship between adenomas at colonoscopy and long-term CRC incidence is unclear. Objective: To compare long-term CRC incidence by colonoscopy adenoma findings. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, prospective cohort study of participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer randomized clinical trial of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG) beginning in 1993 with follow-up for CRC incidence to 2013 across the United States. Participants included 154 900 men and women aged 55 to 74 years enrolled in PLCO of whom 15 935 underwent colonoscopy following their first positive FSG screening result. The final day of follow-up was December 31, 2013. Exposures: Enrolled participants had been randomized to FSG or usual care. Participants who underwent FSG and had abnormal findings were referred for follow-up. Subsequent colonoscopy findings were categorized as advanced adenoma (≥1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, or tubulovillous or villous histology), nonadvanced adenoma (<1 cm without advanced histology), or no adenoma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CRC incidence within 15 years of the baseline colonoscopy. The secondary outcome was CRC mortality. Results: There were 15 935 participants who underwent colonoscopy (men, 59.7%; white, 90.7%; median age, 64 y [IQR, 61-68]). On initial colonoscopy, 2882 participants (18.1%) had an advanced adenoma, 5068 participants (31.8%) had a nonadvanced adenoma, and 7985 participants (50.1%) had no adenoma; median follow-up for CRC incidence was 12.9 years. CRC incidence rates per 10 000 person-years of observation were 20.0 (95% CI, 15.3-24.7; n = 70) for advanced adenoma, 9.1 (95% CI, 6.7-11.5; n = 55) for nonadvanced adenoma, and 7.5 (95% CI, 5.8-9.7; n = 71) for no adenoma. Participants with advanced adenoma were significantly more likely to develop CRC compared with participants with no adenoma (rate ratio [RR], 2.7 [95% CI, 1.9-3.7]; P < .001). There was no significant difference in CRC risk between participants with nonadvanced adenoma compared with no adenoma (RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.7]; P = .30). Compared with participants with no adenoma, those with advanced adenoma were at significantly increased risk of CRC death (RR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.2-5.7], P = .01), but mortality risk in participants with nonadvanced adenoma was not significantly different (RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.5-2.7], P = .68). Conclusions and Relevance: Over a median of 13 years of follow-up, participants with an advanced adenoma at diagnostic colonoscopy prompted by a positive flexible sigmoidoscopy result were at significantly increased risk of developing colorectal cancer compared with those with no adenoma. Identification of nonadvanced adenoma may not be associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002540.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.