Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800214›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence.

Benjamin Click, Paul F Pinsky, Tom Hickey, Maryam Doroudi, Robert E Schoen

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 155 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00002540 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran1993 to 2027Enrolled76,685ConditionsProstate CarcinomaArmsLaboratory Biomarker Analysis, Medical Examination Assessment, Screening Questionnaire Administration
NCT07314554 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Recurrence Rate and Risk Factors After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric and Intestinal Polyps: A Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorLanZhou UniversityRan2026 to 2029Enrolled2,000ConditionsGastric Polyps, Intestinal Polyps, Colon Polyps, Colorectal Polyps
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 295 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 2.2020.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2020
    Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of MUC1 Peptide Vaccine for Prevention of Recurrent Colorectal Adenoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin ClickDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paul F PinskyDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Tom HickeyInformation Management Services, Rockville, Maryland.
Maryam DoroudiDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert E SchoenDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USInformation Management Services · US

Funding

Digestive Diseases Training ProgramT32DK063922 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ARTEEL, GAVIN E, YADAV, DHIRAJ · 2003 to 2022
$5.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK063922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Individuals with adenomatous polyps are advised to undergo repeated colonoscopy surveillance to prevent subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC), but the relationship between adenomas at colonoscopy and long-term CRC incidence is unclear. Objective: To compare long-term CRC incidence by colonoscopy adenoma findings. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, prospective cohort study of participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer randomized clinical trial of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG) beginning in 1993 with follow-up for CRC incidence to 2013 across the United States. Participants included 154 900 men and women aged 55 to 74 years enrolled in PLCO of whom 15 935 underwent colonoscopy following their first positive FSG screening result. The final day of follow-up was December 31, 2013. Exposures: Enrolled participants had been randomized to FSG or usual care. Participants who underwent FSG and had abnormal findings were referred for follow-up. Subsequent colonoscopy findings were categorized as advanced adenoma (≥1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, or tubulovillous or villous histology), nonadvanced adenoma (<1 cm without advanced histology), or no adenoma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CRC incidence within 15 years of the baseline colonoscopy. The secondary outcome was CRC mortality. Results: There were 15 935 participants who underwent colonoscopy (men, 59.7%; white, 90.7%; median age, 64 y [IQR, 61-68]). On initial colonoscopy, 2882 participants (18.1%) had an advanced adenoma, 5068 participants (31.8%) had a nonadvanced adenoma, and 7985 participants (50.1%) had no adenoma; median follow-up for CRC incidence was 12.9 years. CRC incidence rates per 10 000 person-years of observation were 20.0 (95% CI, 15.3-24.7; n = 70) for advanced adenoma, 9.1 (95% CI, 6.7-11.5; n = 55) for nonadvanced adenoma, and 7.5 (95% CI, 5.8-9.7; n = 71) for no adenoma. Participants with advanced adenoma were significantly more likely to develop CRC compared with participants with no adenoma (rate ratio [RR], 2.7 [95% CI, 1.9-3.7]; P < .001). There was no significant difference in CRC risk between participants with nonadvanced adenoma compared with no adenoma (RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.7]; P = .30). Compared with participants with no adenoma, those with advanced adenoma were at significantly increased risk of CRC death (RR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.2-5.7], P = .01), but mortality risk in participants with nonadvanced adenoma was not significantly different (RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.5-2.7], P = .68). Conclusions and Relevance: Over a median of 13 years of follow-up, participants with an advanced adenoma at diagnostic colonoscopy prompted by a positive flexible sigmoidoscopy result were at significantly increased risk of developing colorectal cancer compared with those with no adenoma. Identification of nonadvanced adenoma may not be associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002540.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAdenomaAgedCohort StudiesColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRiskSigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID29800214
PMCPMC6583246
OpenAlexW2804385360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.