Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800179›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Effect of More vs Less Frequent Follow-up Testing on Overall and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients With Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer: The COLOFOL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Peer Wille-Jørgensen, Ingvar Syk, Kenneth Smedh, Søren Laurberg, Dennis T Nielsen, Sune H Petersen, Andrew G Renehan, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó, Lars Påhlman, Henrik T Sørensen and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00225641 (COLOFOL - A Pragmatic Study to Assess the Frequency of Surveillance Tests After Curative Resection in Patients With Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer - a Randomised Multicentre Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00225641 naunknown statusnot on this map

COLOFOL - A Pragmatic Study to Assess the Frequency of Surveillance Tests After Curative Resection in Patients With Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer - a Randomised Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBispebjerg HospitalRan2006 to 2015Enrolled2,500ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsCT-scan, CEA, X-ray of lungs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peer Wille-JørgensenAbdominal Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital and Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingvar SykDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Kenneth SmedhDepartment of Surgery, Vâstmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.
Søren LaurbergDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dennis T NielsenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sune H PetersenAbdominal Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital and Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrew G RenehanManchester Cancer Research Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Erzsébet Horváth-PuhóDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars PåhlmanDepartment of Surgical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Henrik T SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
COLOFOL Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is common in clinical practice, but evidence of a survival benefit is limited. Objective: To examine overall mortality, colorectal cancer-specific mortality, and colorectal cancer-specific recurrence rates among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer who were randomized after curative surgery to 2 alternative schedules for follow-up testing with computed tomography and carcinoembryonic antigen. Design, Setting, and Participants: Unblinded randomized trial including 2509 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer treated at 24 centers in Sweden, Denmark, and Uruguay from January 2006 through December 2010 and followed up for 5 years; follow-up ended on December 31, 2015. Interventions: Patients were randomized either to follow-up testing with computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen and serum carcinoembryonic antigen at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after surgery (high-frequency group; n = 1253 patients) or at 12 and 36 months after surgery (low-frequency group; n = 1256 patients). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were 5-year overall mortality and colorectal cancer-specific mortality rates. The secondary outcome was the colorectal cancer-specific recurrence rate. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results: Among 2555 patients who were randomized, 2509 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age, 63.5 years; 1128 women [45%]) and 2365 (94.3%) completed the trial. The 5-year overall patient mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 13.0% (161/1253) compared with 14.1% (174/1256) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 1.1% [95% CI, -1.6% to 3.8%]; P = .43). The 5-year colorectal cancer-specific mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 10.6% (128/1248) compared with 11.4% (137/1250) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 0.8% [95% CI, -1.7% to 3.3%]; P = .52). The colorectal cancer-specific recurrence rate was 21.6% (265/1248) in the high-frequency group compared with 19.4% (238/1250) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, -1.0% to 5.4%]; P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer, follow-up testing with computed tomography and carcinoembryonic antigen more frequently compared with less frequently did not result in a significant rate reduction in 5-year overall mortality or colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225641.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAftercareAgedCarcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedMortalityNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29800179
PMCPMC6583244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.