Trial reportJAMA2018
Effect of More vs Less Frequent Follow-up Testing on Overall and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients With Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer: The COLOFOL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00225641 (COLOFOL - A Pragmatic Study to Assess the Frequency of Surveillance Tests After Curative Resection in Patients With Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer - a Randomised Multicentre Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COLOFOL - A Pragmatic Study to Assess the Frequency of Surveillance Tests After Curative Resection in Patients With Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer - a Randomised Multicentre Trial
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Surveillance After Pelvic Exenteration: A Systematic Review of Oncological and Functional Follow-Up.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- ESR Essentials: Imaging in colorectal cancer-practice recommendations by ESGAR.European radiology · 2024Guideline
- Oncological surgery follow-up and quality of life: meta-analysis.The British journal of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- An Evidence-Based Guideline for Surveillance of Patients after Curative Treatment for Colon and Rectal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Guideline
- Diagnostic accuracy of follow-up tests for detecting colorectal cancer recurrences in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of cancer care · 2021Pooled it
- Guideline
- Follow-up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Follow-up intensity after colorectal cancer surgery in patients aged ≤ 50, 50-70 and > 70 years - an analysis within the COLOFOL randomised clinical trial.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Trial
- More vs Less Frequent Follow-Up Testing and 10-Year Mortality in Patients With Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the COLOFOL Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Patterns and resectability of colorectal cancer recurrences: outcome study within the COLOFOL trial.BJS open · 2021Trial
- Organizing substitution of oncological follow-up to primary care: perspectives from secondary care providers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- The impact of time-to-recurrence on post-recurrence mortality in stage I-III colorectal cancer: A nationwide Danish cohort study.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Investigation of a methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 circulating tumour DNA blood test for monitoring treatment response in patients with colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-center and multi-reader comparison of abdominopelvic non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT in the postoperative surveillance of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Earlier postoperative ctDNA detection predicts recurrence and adjuvant therapy benefit in stage II-III colorectal cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of surgical outcomes of robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer in obese versus non-obese patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Prognostic Model for Predicting Polyp Recurrence and Guiding Post-Polypectomy Surveillance Intervals Using the ERCPMP-V5 Dataset.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical Oncologists for Sustainability: A Statement from the SSO Surgical Oncologists for Sustainability Committee.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is common in clinical practice, but evidence of a survival benefit is limited. Objective: To examine overall mortality, colorectal cancer-specific mortality, and colorectal cancer-specific recurrence rates among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer who were randomized after curative surgery to 2 alternative schedules for follow-up testing with computed tomography and carcinoembryonic antigen. Design, Setting, and Participants: Unblinded randomized trial including 2509 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer treated at 24 centers in Sweden, Denmark, and Uruguay from January 2006 through December 2010 and followed up for 5 years; follow-up ended on December 31, 2015. Interventions: Patients were randomized either to follow-up testing with computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen and serum carcinoembryonic antigen at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after surgery (high-frequency group; n = 1253 patients) or at 12 and 36 months after surgery (low-frequency group; n = 1256 patients). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were 5-year overall mortality and colorectal cancer-specific mortality rates. The secondary outcome was the colorectal cancer-specific recurrence rate. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results: Among 2555 patients who were randomized, 2509 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean age, 63.5 years; 1128 women [45%]) and 2365 (94.3%) completed the trial. The 5-year overall patient mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 13.0% (161/1253) compared with 14.1% (174/1256) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 1.1% [95% CI, -1.6% to 3.8%]; P = .43). The 5-year colorectal cancer-specific mortality rate in the high-frequency group was 10.6% (128/1248) compared with 11.4% (137/1250) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 0.8% [95% CI, -1.7% to 3.3%]; P = .52). The colorectal cancer-specific recurrence rate was 21.6% (265/1248) in the high-frequency group compared with 19.4% (238/1250) in the low-frequency group (risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, -1.0% to 5.4%]; P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer, follow-up testing with computed tomography and carcinoembryonic antigen more frequently compared with less frequently did not result in a significant rate reduction in 5-year overall mortality or colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225641.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.