Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800115›Full record

SynthesisJAMA oncology2018

Association of Smoking Status With Recurrence, Metastasis, and Mortality Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Beat Foerster, Carmen Pozo, Mohammad Abufaraj, Andrea Mari, Shoji Kimura, David D'Andrea, Hubert John, Shahrokh F Shariat

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smoking and the risk of prostate cancer: a review of risk and disease progression.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Tobacco Assessment in Actively Accruing National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Network Trials.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. From Insights to Impact: Understanding Cancer Screening Choices through Mixed-Methods.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beat FoersterDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Carmen PozoDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mohammad AbufarajDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea MariDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Shoji KimuraDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David D'AndreaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hubert JohnDepartment of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Studies investigating the association of cigarette smoking with prostate cancer incidence and outcomes have revealed controversial results. Objective: To systematically review and analyze the association of smoking status with biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Data Sources: A systematic search of original articles published between January 2000 and March 2017 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in March 2017. Study Selection: Observational studies reporting Cox proportional hazards regression or logistic regression analyses were independently screened. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Available multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% CIs were included in quantitative analysis. A risk-of-bias assessment was completed for nonrandomized studies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified outcomes of interest were biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality. Results: A total of 5157 reports were identified, of which 16 articles were selected for qualitative analysis and 11 articles were selected for quantitative analysis. All included studies were observational and nonrandomized and comprised a total of 22 549 patients. Overall, 4202 patients (18.6%) were current smokers. The overall median follow-up was 72 months. Current smokers had a statistically significantly higher risk of biochemical recurrence (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.66; P < .001 [10 studies]), as did former smokers (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.30; P < .001 [7 studies]). Current smokers were also at a higher risk of metastasis (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.80-3.51; P < .001 [3 studies]) and cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.37-2.60; P < .001 [5 studies]), whereas former smokers were not (metastasis: HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.65-3.97; P = .31 [2 studies]; cancer-specific mortality: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = .70 [4 studies]). Conclusions and Relevance: Current smokers at the time of primary curative treatment for localized prostate cancer are at higher risk of experiencing biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality.

Indexed as

HumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOutcome Assessment, Health CareProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID29800115
PMCPMC6145736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.