Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800113›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2018

Draft genome of a high value tropical timber tree, Teak (Tectona grandis L. f): insights into SSR diversity, phylogeny and conservation.

Ramasamy Yasodha, Ramesh Vasudeva, Swathi Balakrishnan, Ambothi Rathnasamy Sakthi, Nicodemus Abel, Nagarajan Binai, Balaji Rajashekar, Vijay Kumar Waman Bachpai, Chandrasekhara Pillai, Suma Arun Dev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chromosome-scale genome of Indian rosewood (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ramasamy YasodhaDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramesh VasudevaForest Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Swathi BalakrishnanDepartment of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, University of Agricultural Sciences, College of Forestry, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka, India.
Ambothi Rathnasamy SakthiDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nicodemus AbelDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nagarajan BinaiDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Balaji RajashekarGenotypic Technology Private Limited, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vijay Kumar Waman BachpaiDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, R.S. Puram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chandrasekhara PillaiDepartment of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, University of Agricultural Sciences, College of Forestry, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka, India.
Suma Arun DevDepartment of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, University of Agricultural Sciences, College of Forestry, Sirsi, Uttara Kannada, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) is one of the precious bench mark tropical hardwood having qualities of durability, strength and visual pleasantries. Natural teak populations harbour a variety of characteristics that determine their economic, ecological and environmental importance. Sequencing of whole nuclear genome of teak provides a platform for functional analyses and development of genomic tools in applied tree improvement. A draft genome of 317 Mb was assembled at 151× coverage and annotated 36, 172 protein-coding genes. Approximately about 11.18% of the genome was repetitive. Microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are undoubtedly the most informative markers in genotyping, genetics and applied breeding applications. We generated 182,712 SSRs at the whole genome level, of which, 170,574 perfect SSRs were found; 16,252 perfect SSRs showed in silico polymorphisms across six genotypes suggesting their promising use in genetic conservation and tree improvement programmes. Genomic SSR markers developed in this study have high potential in advancing conservation and management of teak genetic resources. Phylogenetic studies confirmed the taxonomic position of the genus Tectona within the family Lamiaceae. Interestingly, estimation of divergence time inferred that the Miocene origin of the Tectona genus to be around 21.4508 million years ago.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticBase SequenceGenomicsLamiaceaeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29800113
PMCPMC6105116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.