Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800062›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2018

Clinicians' Perspectives on Providing Emergency-Only Hemodialysis to Undocumented Immigrants: A Qualitative Study.

Lilia Cervantes, Sara Richardson, Rajeev Raghavan, Nova Hou, Romana Hasnain-Wynia, Matthew K Wynia, Catherine Kleiner, Michel Chonchol, Allison Tong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lilia CervantesDenver Health and University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado (L.C.).
Sara RichardsonDenver Health, Denver, Colorado (S.R., R.H., C.K.).
Rajeev RaghavanHarris Health and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (R.R.).
Nova HouUniversity of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas (N.H.).
Romana Hasnain-WyniaDenver Health, Denver, Colorado (S.R., R.H., C.K.).
Matthew K WyniaUniversity of Colorado, Denver, Colorado (M.K.W., M.C.).
Catherine KleinerDenver Health, Denver, Colorado (S.R., R.H., C.K.).
Michel ChoncholUniversity of Colorado, Denver, Colorado (M.K.W., M.C.).
Allison TongUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, and The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia (A.T.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the United States, nearly half of undocumented immigrants with end-stage kidney disease receive hemodialysis only when they are evaluated in an emergency department and are found to have life-threatening renal failure ("emergency-only hemodialysis" [EOHD]). These patients experience psychosocial distress and much higher mortality than patients receiving regularly scheduled hemodialysis, but little is known about how providing EOHD affects the clinicians involved. Objective: To understand clinicians' experiences providing EOHD. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Setting: A safety-net hospital in Denver, Colorado, and a safety-net system in Houston, Texas. Participants: Fifty interdisciplinary clinicians experienced in providing EOHD. Measurements: Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Outcomes included themes and subthemes. Results: Four themes and 13 subthemes (in parentheses) were identified: 1) drivers of professional burnout (emotional exhaustion from witnessing needless suffering and high mortality, jeopardizing patient trust, detaching from patients, perceived lack of control over EOHD criteria, and physical exhaustion from overextending to bridge care), 2) moral distress from propagating injustice (altered care based on nonmedical factors, focus on volume at the expense of quality, and need to game the system), 3) confusing and perverse financial incentives (wasting resources, confusing financial incentives, and concerns about sustainability), and 4) inspiration toward advocacy (deriving inspiration from patients and strengthened altruism). Limitation: Whether the findings apply to other settings is unknown, and social desirability response bias might have reduced reporting of negative perceptions and experiences. Conclusion: Clinicians in safety-net settings who provide EOHD to undocumented patients describe experiencing moral distress and being driven toward professional burnout. The burden of EOHD on clinicians should inform discussions of systemic approaches to support provision of adequate care based on medical need. Primary Funding Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelRenal DialysisUndocumented ImmigrantsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansQualitative ResearchSafety-net ProvidersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29800062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.