Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29800048›Full record

Trial reportJAMA dermatology2018

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Rapamycin in Patients With Facial Angiofibromas Secondary to Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: The TREATMENT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mary Kay Koenig, Cynthia S Bell, Adelaide A Hebert, Joan Roberson, Joshua A Samuels, John M Slopis, Patti Tate, Hope Northrup, TREATMENT Trial Collaborators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01526356 (Phase II Study of Topical Rapamycin to Erase Angiofibromas in TSC-Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01526356 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study of Topical Rapamycin to Erase Angiofibromas in TSC-Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2012 to 2014Enrolled179ConditionsAngiofibromas, Tuberous SclerosisArmsPlacebo, Rapamycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapamycin and rapalogs for tuberous sclerosis complex.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Dermatology patient-derived health utility of facial angiofibroma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Tuberous sclerosis complex.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effective Technique Using Combined COCase reports in dermatological medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Kay KoenigDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Cynthia S BellDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Adelaide A HebertDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Joan RobersonDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Joshua A SamuelsDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
John M SlopisDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Patti TateDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Hope NorthrupDepartment of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
TREATMENT Trial Collaborators
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Facial angiofibromas occur in approximately 75% of individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), causing substantial morbidity and disfigurement. Current therapies are partially effective, uncomfortable, produce scarring, and need repeating to treat recurrence. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical rapamycin for TSC-related facial angiofibromas. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial with 6 monthly clinic visits enrolled 179 patients with TSC-related facial angiofibromas not treated within 6 months from May 2012 to March 2014 in 9 clinical sites in the United States and 1 in Australia. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to topical formulation containing 0.3 g per 30 g (1%) rapamycin, 0.03 g per 30 g (0.1%) rapamycin, or vehicle alone. Participants applied 1.0 mL to designated areas daily at bedtime. Main Outcomes and Measures: Angiofibroma Grading Scale (AGS) change from baseline scored from photographs by independent masked dermatologists. Safety analyses included adverse events (AEs) and serum rapamycin levels. Results: All 179 patients randomized (99 [55.3%] female) comprised the primary analysis population (59 in the 1% rapamycin group, 63 in the 0.1% rapamycin group, and 57 in the vehicle-only group). The mean age was 20.5 years (range 3-61 years). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in facial angiofibromas was observed for both 1% and 0.1% rapamycin relative to the vehicle-only control group, and for 1% vs 0.1% rapamycin, with most of the improvement realized within the first month. At 6 months, AGS mean improvement for 1% rapamycin was 16.7 points compared with 11.0 for 0.1% rapamycin and 2.1 points for vehicle only (P < .001 for 1% and 0.1% vs vehicle only). Compared with baseline, end-of-treatment photos were rated "better" for 81.8% of patients in the 1% rapamycin group, compared with 65.5% for those in the 0.1% rapamycin group and 25.5% for those in the vehicle-only group (P < .001, all 3 pairwise comparisons). Topical rapamycin was generally well-tolerated, with no measurable systemic absorption. Apparent drug-related adverse effects were limited to 10% or less incidence of application site discomfort and/or pain, pruritus, erythema, and irritation. Nearly all AEs were mild, with no drug-related moderate, severe, or serious events. Conclusions and Relevance: Topical rapamycin appears effective and safe for treatment of TSC-related facial angiofibromas. In this trial, the preferred dose was 1% once daily. Future studies are needed to evaluate prophylactic, early, and long-term use of topical rapamycin, durability of response, and combination therapy with oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01526356.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdolescentAdultAngiofibromaChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFacial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID29800048
PMCPMC6128508
OpenAlexW2804294396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.