Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2018
Effect of Needle Aspiration of Pneumothorax on Subsequent Chest Drain Insertion in Newborns: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Beyond overall accuracy: Does an artificial intelligence model detect the neonatal pneumothoraces that matter most? Reply to Sanmoto et al.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Can We Use Simple Radiographic Measurements to Predict Need for Intervention in Neonatal Pneumothorax?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bilateral renal agenesis: fetal intervention and outcomes.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Laryngeal Mask Airway Method for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Neonates with Pneumothorax Complicating Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with Pneumothorax in Very Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Incidence and Management of Neonatal Pneumothorax in a 10-Hospital Regional Perinatal Network in Switzerland: A Retrospective Observational Study.American journal of perinatology · 2024Observational
- Pneumothorax in a term newborn.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
- Telemedicine-guided thoracentesis of tension pneumothorax in a term newborn.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2024Article
- Neonatal Pneumothorax Outcome in Preterm and Term Newborns.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Association between ventilatory settings and pneumothorax in extremely preterm neonates.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021Article
- Study protocol for the POPART study-Prophylactic Oropharyngeal surfactant for Preterm infants: A Randomised Trial.BMJ open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Treatment options for a symptomatic pneumothorax in newborns include needle aspiration (NA) and chest drain (CD) insertion. There is little consensus as to the preferred treatment, reflecting a lack of evidence from clinical trials. Objective: To investigate whether treating pneumothoraces diagnosed on chest radiography (CR) in newborns receiving respiratory support with NA results in fewer infants having CDs inserted within 6 hours of diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 7, 2013, to December 21, 2016. The setting was 5 tertiary European neonatal intensive care units. Infants receiving respiratory support (endotracheal ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, or supplemental oxygen >40%) who had a pneumothorax on CR that clinicians deemed needed treatment were eligible for inclusion. Interventions: Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to drainage using NA or CD insertion, stratified by center and gestation at birth (<32 vs ≥32 weeks). Caregivers were not masked to group assignment. For NA, a needle was inserted between the ribs to aspirate air and was removed once air was no longer aspirated. A CD was inserted if clinicians deemed that the response was inadequate. For CD insertion, a drain was inserted between the ribs and was left in situ. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was whether a CD was inserted on the side of the pneumothorax within 6 hours of diagnosis. Results: A total of 76 infants were randomly assigned, and 6 (4 assigned to NA and 2 to CD) were excluded because they met exclusion criteria at enrollment. Of the 70 remaining infants, 33 (16 male [48%]) were assigned to NA and 37 (22 male [59%]) to CD insertion. Their median (interquartile range [IQR]) gestational age was 31 (27-38) vs 31 (27-35) weeks, and their median (IQR) birth weight was 1385 (1110-3365) vs 1690 (1060-2025) g, respectively. Fewer infants assigned to NA had a CD inserted within 6 hours (55% [18 of 33] vs 100% [37 of 37]; relative risk, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75) and during hospitalization (70% [23 of 33] vs 100% [37 of 37]; relative risk, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.56-0.87). Conclusions and Relevance: Needle aspiration reduced the rate of CD insertion in symptomatic newborns with pneumothorax on CR. It should be used as the initial method of draining radiologically confirmed pneumothorax in symptomatic infants. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN65161530.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.