Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799960›Full record

Trial reportJAMA dermatology2018

Efficacy of Guselkumab Compared With Adalimumab and Placebo for Psoriasis in Specific Body Regions: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Peter Foley, Kenneth Gordon, Christopher E M Griffiths, Yasmine Wasfi, Bruce Randazzo, Michael Song, Shu Li, Yaung-Kaung Shen, Andrew Blauvelt

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02207231 phase3completednot on this map

Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Comparator-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2014 to 2020Enrolled837ConditionsPsoriasisArmsGuselkumab 100 mg, Placebo for guselkumab, Adalimumab, Placebo for adalimumab
NCT02207244 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Comparator-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Retreatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2014 to 2020Enrolled992ConditionsPsoriasisArmsGuselkumab 100 mg, Placebo for guselkumab, Adalimumab, Placebo for adalimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Durability of response to icotrokinra for high-impact site psoriasis: 1-year ICONIC-TOTAL findings.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. IL-23 Inhibitors in Psoriasis: What Have We Learnt so Far?Journal of inflammation research · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter FoleyDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kenneth GordonDepartment of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Christopher E M GriffithsDermatology Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England.
Yasmine WasfiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Bruce RandazzoJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Michael SongJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Shu LiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Yaung-Kaung ShenJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
Andrew BlauveltOregon Medical Research Center, Portland.
Janssen (United States) · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USOregon Medical Research Center · USSalford Royal Hospital · GBSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Psoriasis of the scalp, palms and/or soles, and nails is challenging to treat. Objective: To evaluate the effect of guselkumab on psoriasis in specific body regions. Design, Setting, and Participants: VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 were, double-blind, placebo- and adalimumab-controlled studies of guselkumab conducted at 101 and 115 global sites, respectively, from November 3, 2014, to May 19, 2016. Patients had moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score ≥12, Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3, and ≥10% body surface area with psoriasis). This post hoc data analysis was performed from February 10 through November 15, 2017. Exposures: Patients were randomized to guselkumab, 100 mg (weeks 0 and 4, then every 8 weeks); placebo followed by guselkumab, 100 mg, starting at week 16; or adalimumab (80 mg [week 0] and 40 mg [week 1, then every 2 weeks]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy was assessed through week 24. End points included numbers of patients achieving scores of 0 or 1 (clear or near clear) or 0 (clear) on the scalp-specific IGA (ss-IGA), Physician's Global Assessment of the hands and/or feet (hf-PGA), and fingernail PGA (f-PGA) and percentage of improvement in target Nail Psoriasis Severity Index score. Results: Of 1829 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [12.4] years; 1300 [71.1%] male, 1498 [81.9%] white), 1576 (86.2%) had psoriasis of the scalp; 501 (27.4%), palms and/or soles; and 1049 (57.4%), fingernails. At baseline, 1512 (82.7%), 461 (25.2%), and 928 (50.7%) patients had a score of 2 or higher on the ss-IGA, hf-PGA, and f-PGA, respectively, and were included in the analysis. Guselkumab was superior to placebo based on the proportion of patients achieving an ss-IGA score of 0 or 1 (560 [81.8%] vs 43 [12.4%]) at week 16 and to adalimumab (582 [85.0%] vs 329 [68.5%]) at week 24 (both P < .001); 479 (69.9%) in the guselkumab group vs 270 (56.3%) in the adalimumab group achieved an ss-IGA score of 0 (all P < .001). An hf-PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 154 patients (75.5%) in the guselkumab group vs 15 (14.2%) in the placebo group at week 16 and 164 (80.4%) in the guselkumab group vs 91 (60.3%) in the adalimumab group at week 24; 153 (75.0%) in the guselkumab group vs 76 (50.3%) in the adalimumab group achieved an hf-PGA score of 0 (all P < .001). An f-PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 196 patients (46.7%) in the guselkumab group vs 32 (15.2%) in the placebo group at week 16 (P < .001) and 252 (60.0%) in the guselkumab group vs 191 (64.3%) in the adalimumab group at week 24 (P = .11); 115 (27.4%) in the guselkumab group vs 83 (27.9%) in the adalimumab group achieved an f-PGA score of 0 (P = .63). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with adalimumab, guselkumab was associated with significant improvement in psoriasis on the scalp and palms and/or soles; magnitude of improvement in fingernails did not differ between treatments. These results may help dermatologists make treatment decisions for patients with psoriasis in difficult-to-treat body regions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02207231 and NCT02207244.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsFemaleFoot DermatosesHand DermatosesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNailsPlacebosPsoriasisScalp DermatosesSeverity of Illness IndexAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsguselkumabPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID29799960
PMCPMC6145649
OpenAlexW2804010661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.