ArticleJAMA surgery2018
Performance of a Genomic Sequencing Classifier for the Preoperative Diagnosis of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
167 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 372 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Integration of AI-driven ultrasound and molecular testing to improve diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of Afirma GSC to ThyroSeq V3 in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.European thyroid journal · 2025Pooled it
- 2023 European Thyroid Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for thyroid nodule management.European thyroid journal · 2023Guideline
- Real-World Performance of the Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC)-A Meta-analysis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Pooled it
- Assessing Bias and Limitations of Clinical Validation Studies of Molecular Diagnostic Tests for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2022Pooled it
- Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Bethesda III and IV Thyroid Nodules Managed Nonoperatively After Molecular Testing With Afirma GSC or Thyroseq v3.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Trial
- Molecular Testing for Thyroid Nodules of Indeterminate Cytology: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2022Trial
- Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life Following Molecular Testing for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Trial
- A Novel Risk Stratification System for Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Cytology-A Pilot Cohort Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Trial
- Incremental Diagnostic Value of Cell-Block-Based Targeted BRAF and RAS Testing in TBSRTC Category III-IV Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A serum thyroid hormone metabolite test for molecular diagnostic evaluation of thyroid nodules.Cell research · 2026Article
- The Diagnostic Performance of Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier in Black and Hispanic Patients With Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Distinct molecular profiles of indeterminate and malignant thyroid nodules in patients under 21 years of age.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Article
- The role of insurance status in molecular testing for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- National Trends in Thyroidectomy and Molecular Diagnostic Utilization: A Medicare Analysis (2016-2023).The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Genomics and Multi-Omics to Guide Clinical Management in Thyroid Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Utility of genomic sequencing classifier in managing cytologically indeterminate oncocytic thyroid nodules.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Afirma genomic sequencing classifier performance in young patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Use of next-generation sequencing of RNA and machine learning algorithms can classify the risk of malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules to limit unnecessary diagnostic surgery. Objective: To measure the performance of a genomic sequencing classifier for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Design, Setting, and Participants: A blinded validation study was conducted on a set of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules collected by fine-needle aspiration biopsy between June 2009 and December 2010 from 49 academic and community centers in the United States. All patients underwent surgery without genomic information and were assigned a histopathology diagnosis by an expert panel blinded to all genomic information. There were 210 potentially eligible thyroid biopsy samples with Bethesda III or IV indeterminate cytopathology that constituted a cohort previously used to validate the gene expression classifier. Of these, 191 samples (91.0%) had adequate residual RNA for validation of the genomic sequencing classifier. Algorithm development and independent validation occurred between August 2016 and May 2017. Exposures: Thyroid nodule surgical histopathology diagnosis by an expert panel blinded to all genomic data. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was measurement of genomic sequencing classifier sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values in biopsies from Bethesda III and IV nodules. The secondary end point was measurement of classifier performance in biopsies from Bethesda II, V, and VI nodules. Results: Of the 183 included patients, 142 (77.6%) were women, and the mean (range) age was 51.7 (22.0-85.0) years. The genomic sequencing classifier had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 79-98) and a specificity of 68% (95% CI, 60-76). At 24% cancer prevalence, the negative predictive value was 96% (95% CI, 90-99) and the positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI, 36-58). Conclusions and Relevance: The genomic sequencing classifier demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy for identifying benign nodules. Its 36% increase in specificity compared with the gene expression classifier potentially increases the number of patients with benign nodules who can safely avoid unnecessary diagnostic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.