Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799773›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2018

Cognition as a Window into Neuronal Population Space.

Douglas A Ruff, Amy M Ni, Marlene R Cohen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05004649 (The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05004649 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsVisual PerceptionArmsPsychophysical task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structure Guides Function: Beyond Pairwise Neural Interactions.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Loss of neuronal population organization links pathology to behavior in a model of Alzheimer's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How attention-like behavior emerges in an artificial neural network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Identifying Interpretable Latent Factors with Sparse Component Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas A RuffDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA; email: cohenm@pitt.edu.
Amy M NiDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA; email: cohenm@pitt.edu.
Marlene R CohenDepartment of Neuroscience and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA; email: cohenm@pitt.edu.

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ethan A Rossi · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Using Neuronal Populations to Probe Perceptual DecisionsR01EY022930 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COHEN, MARLENE ROCHELLE · 2013 to 2022
$3.8M
Using Attention to Understand Cortical Population CodesR00EY020844 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COHEN, MARLENE ROCHELLE · 2011 to 2013
$730k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R00 EY020844NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how cognitive processes affect the responses of sensory neurons may clarify the relationship between neuronal population activity and behavior. However, tools for analyzing neuronal activity have not kept up with technological advances in recording from large neuronal populations. Here, we describe prevalent hypotheses of how cognitive processes affect sensory neurons, driven largely by a model based on the activity of single neurons or pools of neurons as the units of computation. We then use simple simulations to expand this model to a new conceptual framework that focuses on subspaces of population activity as the relevant units of computation, uses comparisons between brain areas or to behavior to guide analyses of these subspaces, and suggests that population activity is optimized to decode the large variety of stimuli and tasks that animals encounter in natural behavior. This framework provides new ways of understanding the ever-growing quantity of recorded population activity data.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysCerebral CortexCognitionComputer SimulationHumansModels, NeurologicalPerceptionSensory Receptor Cellsattentioncognitioninformation codingnoise correlationsspike count correlationsvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID29799773
PMCPMC6571103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.