ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2018
Self-Consistent Framework Connecting Experimental Proxies of Protein Dynamics with Configurational Entropy.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic yet well-defined organization of the FUS RGG3 dense phase.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- A new view of missense mutations in α-mannosidosis using molecular dynamics conformational ensembles.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Computational Approaches to Predict Protein-Protein Interactions in Crowded Cellular Environments.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Configurational Entropy Components and Their Contribution to Biomolecular Complex Formation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recently developed NMR techniques enable estimation of protein configurational entropy change from the change in the average methyl order parameters. This experimental observable, however, does not directly measure the contribution of intramolecular couplings, protein main-chain motions, or angular dynamics. Here, we carry out a self-consistent computational analysis of the impact of these missing contributions on an extensive set of molecular dynamics simulations of different proteins undergoing binding. Specifically, we compare the configurational entropy change in protein complex formation as obtained by the maximum information spanning tree approximation (MIST), which treats the above entropy contributions directly, and the change in the average NMR methyl and NH order parameters. Our parallel implementation of MIST allows us to treat hard angular degrees of freedom as well as couplings up to full pairwise order explicitly, while still involving a high degree of sampling and tackling molecules of biologically relevant sizes. First, we demonstrate a remarkably strong linear relationship between the total configurational entropy change and the average change in both methyl and backbone-NH order parameters. Second, in contrast to canonical assumptions, we show that the main-chain and angular terms contribute significantly to the overall configurational entropy change and also scale linearly with it. Consequently, linear models starting from the average methyl order parameters are able to capture the contribution of main-chain and angular terms well. After applying the quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator entropy formalism, we establish a similarly strong linear relationship for X-ray crystallographic B-factors. Finally, we demonstrate that the observed linear relationships remain robust against drastic undersampling and argue that they reflect an intrinsic property of compact proteins. Despite their remarkable strength, however, the above linear relationships yield estimates of configurational entropy change whose accuracy appears to be sufficient for qualitative applications only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.