Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799521›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2018

Heat shock factor 1 confers resistance to lapatinib in ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells.

Alisha Yallowitz, Amr Ghaleb, Lucas Garcia, Evguenia M Alexandrova, Natalia Marchenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Heat Shock Proteins and HSF1 in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alisha YallowitzDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8691, USA.
Amr GhalebDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8691, USA.
Lucas GarciaDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8691, USA.
Evguenia M AlexandrovaDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8691, USA.
Natalia MarchenkoDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8691, USA. natalia.marchenko@stonybrook.edu.
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

p63 as a novel factor promoting pregnancy-induced HER2-positive breast cancerK22CA190653 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ALEXANDROVA, EVGUENIA · 2016 to 2018
$473k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA190653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite success of ERBB2-targeted therapies such as lapatinib, resistance remains a major clinical concern. Multiple compensatory receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways are known to contribute to lapatinib resistance. The heterogeneity of these adaptive responses is a significant hurdle for finding most effective combinatorial treatments. The goal of this study was to identify a unifying molecular mechanism whose targeting could help prevent and/or overcome lapatinib resistance. Using the MMTV-ERBB2;mutant p53 (R175H) in vivo mouse model of ERBB2-positive breast cancer, together with mouse and human cell lines, we compared lapatinib-resistant vs. lapatinib-sensitive tumor cells biochemically and by kinome arrays and evaluated their viability in response to a variety of compounds affecting heat shock response. We found that multiple adaptive RTKs are activated in lapatinib-resistant cells in vivo, some of which have been previously described (Axl, MET) and some were novel (PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, VEGFR1, MUSK, NFGR). Strikingly, all lapatinib-resistant cells show chronically activated HSF1 and its transcriptional targets, heat shock proteins (HSPs), and, as a result, superior tolerance to proteotoxic stress. Importantly, lapatinib-resistant tumors and cells retained sensitivity to Hsp90 and HSF1 inhibitors, both in vitro and in vivo, thus providing a unifying and actionable therapeutic node. Indeed, HSF1 inhibition simultaneously downregulated ERBB2, adaptive RTKs and mutant p53, and its combination with lapatinib prevented development of lapatinib resistance in vitro. Thus, the kinome adaptation in lapatinib-resistant ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells is governed, at least in part, by HSF1-mediated heat shock pathway, providing a novel potential intervention strategy to combat resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansLapatinibMice, Inbred C57BLProteolysisTumor Suppressor Protein p53Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHSF1 protein, humanHsf1 protein, mouseHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsLapatinibTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID29799521
PMCPMC5967334
OpenAlexW2804423314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.