Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799487›Full record

ArticleBiology2018

Inpactor, Integrated and Parallel Analyzer and Classifier of LTR Retrotransposons and Its Application for Pineapple LTR Retrotransposons Diversity and Dynamics.

Simon Orozco-Arias, Juan Liu, Reinel Tabares-Soto, Diego Ceballos, Douglas Silva Domingues, Andréa Garavito, Ray Ming, Romain Guyot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. InpactorDB: A Plant LTR Retrotransposon Reference Library.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The apricot (Horticulture research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon Orozco-AriasDepartment of Electronics and Automatization, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Manizales 170002, Colombia. simon.orozco.arias@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5991-8770
Juan LiuFAFU and UIUC-SIB Joint Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China. relaxljliu@sina.com.
Reinel Tabares-SotoDepartment of Electronics and Automatization, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Manizales 170002, Colombia. rtabares@autonoma.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-5211
Diego CeballosDepartment of Systems and Informatics, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170002, Colombia. diego.ceballos@ucaldas.edu.co.
Douglas Silva DominguesDepartment of Botany, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Rio Claro, SP 13506-900, Brazil. doug@rc.unesp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-1290-0853
Andréa GaravitoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170002, Colombia. neagef@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-8608
Ray MingFAFU and UIUC-SIB Joint Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China. rming@life.uiuc.edu.
Romain GuyotDepartment of Electronics and Automatization, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Manizales 170002, Colombia. romain.guyot@ird.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7016-7485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One particular class of Transposable Elements (TEs), called Long Terminal Repeats (LTRs), retrotransposons, comprises the most abundant mobile elements in plant genomes. Their copy number can vary from several hundreds to up to a few million copies per genome, deeply affecting genome organization and function. The detailed classification of LTR retrotransposons is an essential step to precisely understand their effect at the genome level, but remains challenging in large-sized genomes, requiring the use of optimized bioinformatics tools that can take advantage of supercomputers. Here, we propose a new tool: Inpactor, a parallel and scalable pipeline designed to classify LTR retrotransposons, to identify autonomous and non-autonomous elements, to perform RT-based phylogenetic trees and to analyze their insertion times using High Performance Computing (HPC) techniques. Inpactor was tested on the classification and annotation of LTR retrotransposons in pineapple, a recently-sequenced genome. The pineapple genome assembly comprises 44% of transposable elements, of which 23% were classified as LTR retrotransposons. Exceptionally, 16.4% of the pineapple genome assembly corresponded to only one lineage of the

Indexed as

HPCInpactorLTR retrotransposonsparallel programmingpineappletransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID29799487
PMCPMC6022998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.