Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799099›Full record

Trial reportDrugs in R&D2018

Co-crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib in Patients with Moderate to Severe Acute Post-surgical Oral Pain: A Dose-Finding, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Multicentre, Phase II Trial.

José López-Cedrún, Sebastián Videla, Miguel Burgueño, Inma Juárez, Samir Aboul-Hosn, Rafael Martín-Granizo, Joan Grau, Miguel Puche, José-Luis Gil-Diez, José-Antonio Hueto and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Drug-drug cocrystals: Opportunities and challenges.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

José López-CedrúnDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Sebastián VidelaClinical Investigation Department, Laboratorios del Dr. Esteve, S.A.U., Av Mare de Déu de Montserrat 221, 08041, Barcelona, Spain. svidelaces@gmail.com.
Miguel BurgueñoMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Inma JuárezDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Samir Aboul-HosnDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Plató, Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael Martín-GranizoDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Joan GrauDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain.
Miguel PucheDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
José-Luis Gil-DiezDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
José-Antonio HuetoMaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna VaquéClinical Investigation Department, Laboratorios del Dr. Esteve, S.A.U., Av Mare de Déu de Montserrat 221, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Mariano SustClinical Investigation Department, Laboratorios del Dr. Esteve, S.A.U., Av Mare de Déu de Montserrat 221, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Plata-SalamánClinical Investigation Department, Laboratorios del Dr. Esteve, S.A.U., Av Mare de Déu de Montserrat 221, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni MonnerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib Team
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESEsteve Química (Spain) · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib (CTC), containing equimolar quantities of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) tramadol and celecoxib (100 mg CTC = 44 mg rac-tramadol hydrochloride and 56 mg celecoxib), is a novel API-API co-crystal for the treatment of pain. We aimed to establish the effective dose of CTC for treating acute pain following oral surgery.

methodsA dose-finding, double-blind, randomised, placebo- and active-controlled, multicentre (nine Spanish hospitals), phase II study (EudraCT number: 2011-002778-21) was performed in male and female patients aged ≥ 18 years experiencing moderate to severe pain following extraction of two or more impacted third molars requiring bone removal. Eligible patients were randomised via a computer-generated list to receive one of six single-dose treatments (CTC 50, 100, 150, 200 mg; tramadol 100 mg; and placebo). The primary efficacy endpoint was the sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) over 8 h assessed in the per-protocol population.

resultsBetween 10 February 2012 and 13 February 2013, 334 patients were randomised and received study treatment: 50 mg (n = 55), 100 mg (n = 53), 150 mg (n = 57), or 200 mg (n = 57) of CTC, 100 mg tramadol (n = 58), or placebo (n = 54). CTC 100, 150, and 200 mg showed significantly higher efficacy compared with placebo and/or tramadol in all measures: SPID (0-8 h) (mean [standard deviation]): - 90 (234), - 139 (227), - 173 (224), 71 (213), and 22 (228), respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events was lower in the 50 (12.7% [n = 7]), 100 (11.3% [n = 6]), and 150 (15.8% [n = 9]) mg CTC groups, and similar in the 200 mg (29.8% [n = 17]) CTC group, compared with the tramadol group (29.3% [n = 17]), with nausea, dizziness, and vomiting the most frequent events.

conclusionSignificant improvement in the benefit-risk ratio was observed for CTC (doses ≥ 100 mg) over tramadol and placebo in the treatment of acute pain following oral surgery.

fundingLaboratorios del Dr. Esteve, S.A.U.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMalePostoperative PainTramadolYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDrug CombinationsTramadol

Identifiers

PMID29799099
PMCPMC5995791
OpenAlexW2804670096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.