Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799075›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018

Effect of fixation devices on postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial of permanent tacks, absorbable tacks, and synthetic glue.

Sanne Harsløf, Pia Krum-Møller, Thorbjørn Sommer, Nellie Zinther, Pål Wara, Hans Friis-Andersen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01534780 (A Controlled Randomized Study of Protack, Securestrap and Glubran Glue as Fixation Devices in Laparoscopic Ventral Herniotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01534780 nacompletednot on this map

A Controlled Randomized Study of Protack, Securestrap and Glubran Glue as Fixation Devices in Laparoscopic Ventral Herniotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHorsens HospitalRan2013 to 2017Enrolled75ConditionsVentral HerniaArmslaparoscopic ventral herniotomy, Protack, Securestrap, Glubran
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne HarsløfDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark. sanneharslof@gmail.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-0909
Pia Krum-MøllerDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Thorbjørn SommerDepartment of Surgery, Randers, Denmark.
Nellie ZintherDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Pål WaraDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hans Friis-AndersenDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Regional Hospital Horsens · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe method of anchoring the mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is claimed to cause postoperative pain, affecting the quality of life of the patients. The aim of this randomized study was to compare the effect of three types of fixation devices on postoperative pain, patient quality of life, and hernia recurrence.

methodsPatients with ventral hernias between 2 and 7 cm were randomized into one of three mesh fixation groups: permanent tacks (Protack™), absorbable tacks (Securestrap™), and absorbable synthetic glue (Glubran™). The primary endpoint was pain on the second postoperative day, measured on a visual analogue scale. Quality of life and recurrence rate were secondary endpoints and investigated through questionnaires and clinical examination at follow-up visits 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

resultsSeventy-five non-consecutive patients were included in the study, with 25 patients in each group. There was no significant difference between groups for unspecified pain on the second postoperative day (p = 0.250). The DoloTest™ values were 55.3 ± 28.9 mm, 43.5 ± 28.5 mm, and 55.9 ± 26.3 mm for permanent tacks, absorbable tacks, and synthetic glue, respectively. No differences were observed between groups with respect to quality of life of the patients and hernia recurrence rate.

conclusionsIn patients with small- and medium-sized ventral hernias, the type of fixation device did not affect the immediate or long-term postoperative pain, quality of life, or recurrence rate when comparing permanent tacks, absorbable tacks, and synthetic glue for mesh fixation.

trial registrationNCT01534780.

Indexed as

CyanoacrylatesSuturesAdhesivesAgedFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainQuality of LifeRecurrenceSurgical MeshSuture TechniquesAdhesivesCyanoacrylatesglubranPainQuality of lifeRecurrenceVentral hernia

Identifiers

PMID29799075
OpenAlexW2804342205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.