Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29799072›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2019

Context-induced relapse after extinction versus punishment: similarities and differences.

Nathan J Marchant, Erin J Campbell, Yann Pelloux, Jennifer M Bossert, Yavin Shaham

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting individual incubation of opioid craving by whole-brain functional connectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Risk reshapes amygdala representation of choice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. The Role of Claustrum in Incubation of Opioid Seeking after Electric Barrier-Induced Voluntary Abstinence in Male and Female Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role of Piriform Cortex and Its Afferent Projections in Relapse to Fentanyl Seeking after Food Choice-Induced Voluntary Abstinence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Learning to stop responding.Behavioural processes · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan J MarchantDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.marchant@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-0532
Erin J CampbellThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Yann PellouxBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer M BossertBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yavin ShahamBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Neurobiology Of Relapse To Opiate and Psychostimulant DrugsZIADA000434 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI SHAHAM, YAVIN · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
National Health and Medical Research Council 1105741National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from clinical studies suggest that drug relapse and craving are often provoked by exposure to drug-associated contexts. Since 2002, this phenomenon has been modeled in laboratory animals using the ABA renewal model. In the classical version of this model, rats with a history of drug self-administration in one context (A) undergo extinction in a different context (B) and reinstate (or relapse to) drug seeking after exposure to the original drug-associated context (A). In a more recent version of the model introduced in 2013, the experimental conditions in context A are identical to those used in the classical model, but drug-reinforced responding in context B is suppressed by probabilistic punishment. The punishment-based ABA renewal model is proposed to resemble abstinence in humans, which is often initiated by the desire to avoid the negative consequences of drug use. The goal of our review is to discuss similarities and differences in mechanisms that play a role in suppression of drug seeking in context B and context-induced relapse to drug seeking in context A in the two models. We first describe psychological mechanisms that mediate extinction and punishment of drug-reinforced responding in context B. We then summarize recent findings on brain mechanisms of context-induced relapse of drug seeking after extinction, or punishment-imposed abstinence. These findings demonstrate both similarities and differences in brain mechanisms underlying relapse in the two variations of the ABA renewal model. We conclude by briefly discussing clinical implications of the preclinical studies.

Indexed as

Association LearningDisease Models, AnimalDrug-Seeking BehaviorExtinction, PsychologicalAnimalsBrainBrain MappingConditioning, ClassicalCravingHumansPunishmentRatsRecurrenceReinforcement, PsychologySelf AdministrationSubstance-Related DisordersContextCravingDrug self-administrationExtinctionPunishmentReinstatementRelapseReview

Identifiers

PMID29799072
PMCPMC6373446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.