ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018
Quantification of aortic stiffness in stroke patients using 4D flow MRI in comparison with transesophageal echocardiography.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpolation time-optimized aortic pulse wave velocity estimation by 4D flow MRI.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Evaluated by 4D Flow MRI Across the Adult Lifespan.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
- Investigation of Aortic Wall Thickness, Stiffness and Flow Reversal in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke: A 4D Flow MRI Study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2018 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To quantify stiffness of the descending aorta (DAo) in stroke patients using 4D flow MRI and compare results with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). 48 acute stroke patients undergoing 4D flow MRI and TEE were included. Intima-media-thickness (IMT) was measured in the DAo and the aorta was scrutinized for atherosclerotic plaques using TEE. Stiffness of the DAo was determined by (a) 4D flow MRI at 3 T by calculating pulse wave velocity (PWV) and by (b) TEE calculating arterial strain, stiffness index, and distensibility coefficient. Mean IMT was 1.43 ± 1.75. 7 (14.6%) subjects had no sign of atherosclerosis, 10 (20.8%) had IMT-thickening or plaques < 4 mm, and 31 (66.7%) had at least one large and/or complex plaque in the aorta. Increased IMT significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with increased DAo stiffness in MRI (PWV r = 0.66) and in TEE (strain r = 0.57, stiffness index r = 0.64, distensibility coefficient r = 0.57). Patients with at least IMT-thickening had significantly higher stiffness values compared to patients without atherosclerosis. However, no difference was observed between patients with plaques < 4 mm and patients with plaques ≥ 4 mm. PWV and TEE parameters of stiffness correlated significantly [strain (r = - 0.36; p = 0.011), stiffness index (r = 0.51; p = 0.002), and distensibility coefficient (r = - 0.59; p < 0.001)]. 4D flow MRI and TEE-based parameters of aortic stiffness were associated with markers of atherosclerosis such as IMT-thickness and presence of plaques. We believe that 4D flow MRI is a promising tool for future studies of aortic atherosclerosis, due to its longer coverage of the aorta and non-invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.