Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29798882›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2018

High parasite diversity accelerates host adaptation and diversification.

A Betts, C Gray, M Zelek, R C MacLean, K C King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A BettsDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. alex.betts@evobio.eu kayla.king@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-7583
C GrayDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.
M ZelekDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5516-5644
R C MacLeanDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
K C KingDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. alex.betts@evobio.eu kayla.king@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1393-9220

Funding

European Research Council 281591Wellcome Trust 106918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host-parasite species pairs are known to coevolve, but how multiple parasites coevolve with their host is unclear. By using experimental coevolution of a host bacterium and its viral parasites, we revealed that diverse parasite communities accelerated host evolution and altered coevolutionary dynamics to enhance host resistance and decrease parasite infectivity. Increases in parasite diversity drove shifts in the mode of selection from fluctuating (Red Queen) dynamics to predominately directional (arms race) dynamics. Arms race dynamics were characterized by selective sweeps of generalist resistance mutations in the genes for the host bacterium's cell surface lipopolysaccharide (a bacteriophage receptor), which caused faster molecular evolution within host populations and greater genetic divergence among populations. These results indicate that exposure to multiple parasites influences the rate and type of host-parasite coevolution.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiodiversityEvolution, MolecularHost-Parasite InteractionsBacteriaBacteriophages

Identifiers

PMID29798882
PMCPMC7612933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.