Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29798673›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2018

In Situ Vaccination with Cowpea vs Tobacco Mosaic Virus against Melanoma.

Abner A Murray, Chao Wang, Steven Fiering, Nicole F Steinmetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pleomorphism in Wild-Type and Engineered PP7 Virus-Like Particles.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plant-Derived Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Biopharmaceuticals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abner A Murray
Chao Wang
Steven Fiering
Nicole F SteinmetzORCID 0000-0002-0130-0481
Case Western Reserve University · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Overcoming the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment through in situ vaccination nanotechnology.U01CA218292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIERING, STEVEN, STEINMETZ, NICOLE FRANZISKA · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002549 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HARDING, CLIFFORD V · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandTL1TR000441 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Acquisition of a Leica SCN400 Slide Scanning System For Use In A Multi-User FacilS10RR031845 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CONRAD, PATRICIA A · 2011 to 2011
$377k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000441NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002549NCI NIH HHS U01 CA218292NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR031845NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy approaches have emerged as novel treatment regimens against cancer. A particularly interesting avenue is the concept of in situ vaccination, where immunostimulatory agents are introduced into an identified tumor to overcome local immunosuppression and, if successful, mount systemic antitumor immunity. We had previously shown that nanoparticles from cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) are highly potent in inducing long-lasting antitumor immunity when used as an in situ vaccine in various tumor mouse models. Here we asked whether the nanoparticles from tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) could also be applied as an in situ vaccine and, if so, whether efficacy or mechanism of immune-activation would be affected by the nanoparticle size (300 × 18 nm native TMV vs 50 × 18 nm short TMV nanorods), shape (nanorods vs spherical TMV, termed SNP), or state of assembly (assembled TMV rod vs free coat protein, CP). Our studies indicate that CPMV, but less so TMV, elicits potent antitumor immunity after intratumoral treatment of dermal melanoma (B16F10 using C57BL/6 mice). TMV and TMVshort slowed tumor growth and increased survival time, however, at significantly lower potency compared to that of CPMV. There were no apparent differences between TMV, TMVshort, or the SNP indicating that the aspect ratio does not necessarily play a role in plant viral in situ vaccines. The free CPs did not elicit an antitumor response or immunostimulation, which may indicate that a multivalent assembly is required to trigger an innate immune recognition and activation. Differential potency of CPMV vs TMV can be explained with differences in immune-activation: data indicate that CPMV stimulates an antitumor response through recruitment of monocytes into the tumor microenvironment (TME), establishing signaling through the IFN-γ pathway, which also leads to recruitment of tumor-infiltrated neutrophils (TINs) and natural killer (NK) cells. Furthermore, the priming of the innate immune system also mounts an adaptive response with CD4

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesChromatography, LiquidComovirusCutaneous Malignant MelanomaElectrophoresis, Agar GelFlow CytometryImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyMaleMelanomaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning TransmissionMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionSkin NeoplasmsCancer Vaccinescancercowpea mosaic virusimmunotherapyin situ vaccinationmelanomatobacco mosaic virus

Identifiers

PMID29798673
PMCPMC6230260
OpenAlexW2804954175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.