ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2017
[Research progress and clinical prospect of three-dimensional spheroid culture of mesenchymal stem cells].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human hair follicle-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Isolation, expansion, and differentiation.World journal of stem cells · 2020Review
- [Construction of injectable tissue engineered adipose tissue with fibrin glue scaffold and human adipose-derived stem cells transfected by lentivirus vector expressing hepatocyte growth factor].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the research progress and clinical prospect of three-dimensional spheroid culture of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Methods: Recent literature about three-dimensional spheroid culture of MSCs was summarized, mainly on the formation of MSCs spheroids collected by three-dimensional culture, differences between MSCs spheroids and MSCs collected by traditional two-dimensional culture, and the mechanism underlying these differences. Last, its clinical prospect was discussed. Results: Compared with MSCs collected by traditional two-dimensional culture, MSCs spheroids collected by three-dimensional culture get a salient up-regulation in anti-apoptosis, multiple differentiation potential, paracrine, and anti-inflammatory effect, which may be related to the morphology and cytoskeleton organization, cell-to-cell contact and gap junctions, and the hypoxia microenvironment. The animal experiments show obvious effects in repair of refractory wounds, repair of ischemic injury, and tissue remodeling, so MSCs spheroid has broad clinical prospect. Conclusion: MSCs spheroids collected by three-dimensional culture have stronger biological potential and treatment effect than MSCs collected by traditional two-dimensional culture, MSCs spheroids can be used to optimize stem cell therapy and improve its treatment effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.